DRM, in the broad sense of "verifying the provenance of a user's device for purposes contrary to the user's desires", is a fundamentally losing battle. At the end of the day, the user controls their own device and the people seeking to restrict their behavior need to allow it in some circumstances, so the user can just spoof those circumstances and do what they want anyway. This is why movies still get ripped in high quality the moment they're up on Netflix and you will always be able to find a cracked copy of Photoshop if you look in the right places.
The only remotely reliable way around this is through hardware, because hardware is relatively difficult to reverse engineer. Microsoft is already working on this, adding a chip that runs outside the reach of the OS to cryptographically verify that you're not being naughty. But even this is an arms race they're bound to lose: that cryptographic verification is just an algorithm that can't know any information but what's in your computer already, so there's nothing but time and effort stopping my Linux computer from implementing it in software and sending the very same bytes to Microsoft's servers.
Will anyone reverse engineer this just to fuck with Microsoft Azure? Probably not. But if some misguided souls were to try to build this type of DRM into a widely-used communication protocol with strong philosophical expectations of openness, I can't imagine that it would last very long uncracked.
