fi, en, (sv, ja, hu, yi) | avatar by https://twitter.com/udonkimuchikaki


libera.chat, irc.sortix.org
nortti
microblog (that is, a blog with small entries)
microblog.ahti.space/nortti

Firbozz
@Firbozz

Originally published in 2002, this book wants to teach you how to knit without telling you how to knit. It also opens with this paragraph:

Most anarchists are gentle people. They see that government is a major source of violence in the world since governments get into wars, and that wars make people do monstrous things that they would otherwise never do. So they want to get rid of government. They see that the greatest source of oppression is greed and ownership of the sources of wealth, so they want the means of production owned by those who do the producing. They yearn to see the organizations of society grow from shared interests and mutual benefits–a constant coming together and moving apart so that no firm structure becomes established that could become oppressive. It's straightforward idealistic stuff.


She then goes on to argue that if while global anarchy may not be achievable anarchist ideology may nevertheless be applied to knitting.

[...] The I.W.W. (Industrial Workers of the World, familiarly known as "wobblies") advises: "organize on the issues, not on the ideology." It is the issues I mean to address. If we take control of our knitting and do with it what we like, we have nothing to lose but our chains and we have a world to gain.

In practice, "Anarchist Knitting" as realized in this book is about teaching how knitting works. Zilboorg begins the instructive portion of the book not with how to make a knit stitch, but rather the "Loop Structure of Knitting": how the strand of yarn interlock to form a fabric. Only then does Zilboorg instruct how to make stitches, and even then present methods as possibilities–those who would insist there is one right way to knit are "authoritarian" knitters!

I am passionate about all this, ebcause people tend to be tyrannized by the necessity of wrapping clockwise and knitting through the front of the stitch. I denounce the tyranny of clockwise wrapping and knitting through the front and proclaim the fundamental principle of anarchist knitting:

KNIT WHICHEVER WAY IS RIGHT FOR THE WAY YOU WRAP YOUR YARN. AND WRAP YOUR YARN WHICHEVER WAY YOU CHOOSE.

As a whole I love this book and it's approach to teaching: give people the tools to understand what they're doing. Equip people with the knowledge to do not just what you've shown them, but troubleshoot when things go wrong, extrapolate from the basic principles, and find workarounds that accomplish the same result in a way that suits them.

Tools are a different matter. [...] Unlike machines, tools encourage one to try different things, use them differently. Use a machine for something it wasn't made for and it will most likely break down. Use a knitting needle as a hole punch and it will peaceably comply. Hand work with tools, in this case knitting, encourages individuality in a way that machine work does not. Children should be taught to use tools if only as a counter-balance to all the teaching that tells them to follow directions. Following directions needs to be taught and learned. We cannot navigate through modern life without that ability. But we also need to use the creativity we have. I read recently somewhere, "When man ceases to create, he ceases to be in the image of God." (The sexist language suggests this was written some time ago.) An extreme statement, but I like it. When we do not create, we become like all other social animals, in total bondage to our biology. Following directions socializes us; making our own sets us free. Surely every child should be given tools with which to make things, not just computers to practise on. Knitting needles among others."

Knitting for Anarchists is in the Internet Archive's books collection.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Firbozz's post:

I like how this approach encourages experimentation as like a key part of making things, as opposed to the following a recipe way of making crafts that really deadens them & is almost an industrial project except that you, a human, have agreed to carry it out. It is making me wonder how this interacts with the idea of mastering a craft or art form that might have centuries of built up traditions and in following them you are becoming part of a larger human project.

I wouldn't say that following a pattern/recipe deadens the craft! I definitely agree with the ideas presented in the book and consider experimentation something that's valuable and often overlooked, but that doesn't make a craft created by following a recipe any less meaningful, you know?

I have a number of brain issues that make experimenting hard for me in the context of crochet, and have only managed to get back into it by picking specific patterns with specific directions to follow to the letter. I was pretty hard on myself for this at first, like "what makes this any better than something store-bought and mass-produced if I don't apply Creativity to it," but I came to realize that the enjoyment I get out of the process itself is no less valuable. And the finished craft is no less meaningful to the person I've given it to - they don't care that I followed a pattern for it when they know that I saw this pattern, thought of them specifically, and labored for hours to make it real.

I do want to get to a place where I can wildly improvise like when I first got started, but in order to keep crochet from turning into yet another obligation, yet another job that I have to do "right," I have to learn how to value everything I make - including the more formulaic things.

I think its a really interesting thing to think about! Like I know I have a personal bias towards art that is messy/imperfect as opposed to very properly done. Say like, a gee's bend quilt vs the sort of quilt that wins at a state fair. But if you are trying to giving both the same amount of attention maybe the by-the-books quilt becomes like a meditative piece where the intent is that the hand of the artist is invisible (real contemporary art style stuff).

The "understand the concepts before using the tools and choosing materials" approach is one I wish more instructional documents would take.

I am an intuitive knitter because I have decades of knowledge stored up on every aspect of it and can adapt and change on the fly based on current conditions and what's available (or what I did when not paying attention while knitting in the dark). I felt so lost when I started garment sewing because everybody wanted to give me steps to complete a task, not concepts that would help me understand the steps and tools better. (Once I found the people who like to talk about repair sewing machines and fabricating textiles and drafting patterns I suddenly got so much better at sewing!)

As a Wobbly and believer in anarchy as a verb, I love this book, even though I personally have no intention to knit. I think the core tenet displayed, of treating the student as an equal human with as much of more potential and right than the author credits theirself with to innovate and fully understand, is fundamental to so much of life.