pendell

Current Hyperfixation: Wizard of Oz

  • He/Him

I use outdated technology just for fun, listen to crappy music, and watch a lot of horror movies. Expect posts about These Things. I talk a lot.

Check tags like Star Trek Archive and Media Piracy to find things I share for others.



Not to discount the trans readings of The Matrix or anything, but I honestly think it's quite reductive to sum the whole thing up as "it's about being trans."

I think the material the Wachowskis were heavily inspired by certainly spoke to them on a level even they may not have fully understood at the time and one can certainly see how a pair of very creative and talented "eggs" would find those sorts of themes around identity, self-image, and self-realization extremely compelling.

But The Matrix is not uniquely "trans" because of that. Those themes are deeply relatable to trans people, yes - and there's not a doubt in my mind that relatability was one of the driving forces for them to make the film - but they're also relatable to so many other people for so many other reasons. That's one of the great things about choosing to portray your ideas thematically rather than literally, the scope is so much greater. And there's plenty of stuff in the movie that simply doesn't parse from a trans reading no matter how you look at it - it's one element of a lovely tapestry, one of the colors of thread you can see woven in.

I think this plays into a larger problem I've noticed, where anything a trans creative does is often times read exclusively through the lens of the trans experience. When a trans person is so so much more than "just trans" and I honestly think it's a little insulting to read their work as just about gender.

The Wachowskis loaded up The Matrix with so many pop philosophy concepts and crazy ideas (don't even get me started on the sequels, which I will defend to the death) and personally I'd feel a little insulted if I did all that work and someone was like "well because you're [identity] this is just about [identity.]"

Again not to say that's not a part of it but wow you're leaving a lot on the table if your reading begins and ends there.

I guess really my point is that we need better media literacy and for people to realize art can be about multiple things. I think most people understand that but a concerning amount of people seem not to and will rebut any critique focusing on other elements of something like The Matrix with a blunt "actually it's about being trans."


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @pendell's post:

Yeah, I hope I made it clear that I wasn't saying reading is as trans is wrong at all, it's just one of many parts of the film. If it was just about being trans, well, they probably would've made a movie literally about being trans :p

And I tried to edit out any language that implied I was saying everyone is saying it's just about being trans, but I'm sorry if I still give that vibe. I have just noticed quite a few people treating it that way, like there can only be One interpretation or something. Usually dumb people on birdsite and such.

Oh gosh, on that note of folks believing only one thing about a work of art, I'm remembering the rash of Christian-fundie "theology of the Matrix" books and pamphlets from around that time along with whole sermons preached. And the whole "red pill" thing, which collectively feel like such hijacks. Wachowski's absolutely deserve a rich analysis, appreciation, and multi-layered approach, but I can understand why this particular movie gets the insistence it does. -_-

yeah the wildly off-base interpretations just show how filtering the film through very specific single lenses can let you say it's exclusively about almost any random thing. Ofc the trans takes are a lot closer to the truth tho