pendell

Current Hyperfixation: Wizard of Oz

  • He/Him

I use outdated technology just for fun, listen to crappy music, and watch a lot of horror movies. Expect posts about These Things. I talk a lot.

Check tags like Star Trek Archive and Media Piracy to find things I share for others.



RTD has explicitly stated he won't be answering that question left by "73 Yards" (though we might get some explanation of the more timey-wimey elements) and personally I think that's amazing and perfect. Yes. Good.

Anyone who complains about 73 Yards being bad because of open-ended vagueness and not answering every question makes me wonder - would you treat "Midnight" the same way if it aired today? "Ugh, awful episode, we didn't even get to see the monster! What a waste of time!"

Like, tell me you have no media literacy or willingness to engage with media on its own terms without telling me. Honestly.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @pendell's post:

When Babylon 5 ended, a bunch of people got online to scream about how the show was terrible because it never provided closure on their personal list of favorite side-plots that didn't really have anything going on than background flavor. And while I don't love Straczynski's approach to engaging with criticism (usually, it's "everything you liked, it's because I had full control, and everything that you didn't like happened because of network interference," or grumping about answering things multiple times), but in that instance, he posted a hilarious rant about how The Lord of the Rings never tells us what happens to fan-favorite Tom Bombadil.

I don't know which specific open question this is, but since I'm not watching this to piece together the universe's cosmology, I also probably wouldn't see the question as relevant to the story...

The question is most definitely not relevant to the story and like 90% of the meat is that lack of closure, a character's fright, coping, and eventual acceptance of the unknown. 73 Yards is a lovely Welsh gothic horror you should totally check out if you have the time.

Oh, yeah, sorry about the vagueness. I watched it, enjoyed it other than a few details, and have to imagine that anybody complaining assumed that they were watching something where the characters don't matter. But while "it didn't really happen" is kind of a hack move, it explicitly reinforces that they wrote a character study, not a treatise on Welsh folklore.

That's what I tried to get at with the Straczynski story. Whatever the specific question was, it's going to come off like the equivalent of writing an extensive open letter to Tolkien demanding to know the ultimate fate of some guy who showed up for two pages.

And not to be "that guy," but c'mon, this is literally the structure of almost the entire franchise, dressing up horror tropes to look vaguely like science fiction, so that we can get to know the human characters without the need to answer pesky question, like Star Trek is (at its best) about making fun of conservatives and Star Wars is about constantly re-litigating the Vietnam War. Detailed explanations went out the window with the idea that they worked on an educational children's show. The only difference here is that the lead got some extra sleep instead of spewing out piles of meaningless technobabble to placate the audience...

To be fair, people DID act that way around Midnight, to the point where I still saw people asking "What was the Midnight entity" up to a couple years ago

Both questions are identical, though: destined to be asked for years by pedants who can't accept that openness is part of the original story's appeal