last night i wanted to read some critical opinions on the SFC game i'm playing, Front Mission Gun Hazard, and thought, i bet one of those "backlog" sites has some decent reviews schema. googling brought up backloggd.com, and it does have the letterboxd-but-games vibe i was hoping for (it had like six reviews of Gun Hazard).
aside from the backlog concept the site seems fine. i was a little surprised to see how low scores were for some classic Nintendo-made NES games, though! 2.6 for Zelda II? 2.7 for the charming, innovative Kid Icarus? is og Metroid really that offputting? gosh.
bonus screenshot of Simon's Quest getting expectedly reamed.
looking around a bit more the site does seem to have a letterboxd-esque scoring balance in which 5s are rare, so that explains it some. i actually do like that. but it is a little strange to remember some of these games as universally beloved when we were kids and find people who were born 20 years later having a very different experience.
i know, the nature of generations, my childhood naiveté imagining consensus, etc. just feels surprising, and it's odd how someone discovering Zelda II's existence through this could have a much different impression than me of how it was received in 1988.
looking at the NES platform page, i seem to be noticing that Nintendo's NES releases often fare worse than third parties'. my guess is that there are a greater number of new players going back to investigate Nintendo's releases than, say, your typical quality but third-party Chip & Dale: Rescue Rangers (3.5, 36 reviews) type game.
anyway not to get too hung up on opinions on the internet. just interesting to notice. would be neat if someone ran stats on all this sometime to try and draw out trends.
This website is utterly fascianting. I've always been super into reviews and critique, and I like looking at trends and thoughts.
I immediately went to look at how Sega's stuff is faring. The classic Sega stuff is actually faring WAY better than the Nintendo stuff, but it had far, far less plays. Sure, Panzer Dragoon Saga has a 4.34, but it also has 243 plays over Zelda 2's 4.2k.
I think the most interesting thing I found though was giving Illbleed a 3.7 while Sonic Adventure 2 got a 3.6. That is so fucking funny to me. Again, there's the play-amount discrepancy though, so whoever's playing Illbleed is probably actively seeking it out knowing what they'll get.
I could look at this website for hours lol
Also, for my own personal thoughts, I think Kid Icarus and Metroid are like... 4/10s. They've aged and while are cool and charming/influential, are so rough today, even for someone who grew up with them. Zelda 2 though is fucking great, and I'd give it an 8/10 or a 9/10. But I get its not for modern sensibilities.
(also, also, Tall: Twins Tower has one review, and two people on this site who have played it lol. It has a 3.0.)
