• they/them

plural system in Seattle, WA (b. 1974)
lots of fictives from lots of media, some horses, some dragons, I dunno. the Pnictogen Wing is poorly mapped.

host: Mx. Kris Dreemurr (they/them)

chief messenger and usual front: Mx. Chara or Χαρά (they/them)

other members:
Mx. Frisk, historian (they/them)
Monophylos Fortikos, unicorn (he/him)
Kel the Purple, smol derg (xe/xem)
Pim the Dragon, Kel's sister (she/her)


something astonishing happened to me earlier today: I watched the profoundly problematical M. Night Shyamalan film Glass, one of two films featuring a questionable and gimmicky depiction of DID plurality by James McAvoy—I'd seen the film once before and it was just painful, but this time...I found that I liked the movie. yes, it's still problematical; yes, Shyamalan makes some very poor creative decisions. but the film got my sympathy.

Shyamalan's post-stardom films have a cheap and nasty look about them, but now that seems to me more like the cost of working a "B-movie" sort of career. we don't really have "B-movies" any more because the "double feature" no longer really exists, but Shyamalan now seems to occupy similar territory to a filmmaker like Sam Fuller or Budd Boetticher: he's making movies with low budgets and lesser-known actors, putting as much style and messaging as he can into them, and he's at least trying to tell stories with far more emotional rawness then you'll get from a polished top-tier Hollywood film. Sam Fuller's Shock Corridor is an "exploitation" movie about mental illness, much like Shyamalan's Split or Glass, but it's still worth watching.

(Split is maybe more upsetting, though.)

~Chara


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @pnictogen-wing's post:

I think the idea of Split would be fun in a vacuum (and I think James McAvoy goes all in on the performance) but when you put it in the context of how it reinforces deeply harmful cultural stereotypes about DID it's pretty shit - and the movie itself tries so desperately hard to put it into that context.

Like, maybe, if the psychiatrist lady had been more like "hmm no this is completely different from any known case of DID" and the movie leaned more heavily into that, you would've had something? Maybe if it had at least one sympathetic DID character? But nah, this is totally what ALL DID peeps are like and they would all totally become insane supervillains if put into the right circumstances. Ok movie. Sure. also don't forget self harm may come in handy and save your life one day???

yeah that's the thing..."Glass" isn't really about DID and you can kinda...lightly brush over the fact that the James McAvoy character is supposed to have it. but "Split" (as I recall) is far too keen to pretend that it's got some kind of grounding in known psychology. so you end up with something like "Silence of the Lambs", a movie that's acting like it's giving us a psychological case study when really it's just wallowing in grotesquerie. ~Chara