• they/them

plural system in Seattle, WA (b. 1974)
lots of fictives from lots of media, some horses, some dragons, I dunno. the Pnictogen Wing is poorly mapped.

host: Mx. Kris Dreemurr (they/them)

chief messenger and usual front: Mx. Chara or Χαρά (they/them)

other members:
Mx. Frisk, historian (they/them)
Monophylos Fortikos, unicorn (he/him)
Kel the Purple, smol derg (xe/xem)
Pim the Dragon, Kel's sister (she/her)


lapisnev
@lapisnev

like yeah they haven't fulfilled their original purpose of allowing you to keep a CRT warmed up without burning in an image in about two decades but it annoyed me that we went from "computers are Contraptions that do Whimsical Things like dinging and playing back animated GIFs and making a whole lot of clatter to remember a few megabytes of information" to "everything with a CPU in it is a Device and it must look flat and abstract and be able to turn on and off instantly and anything fun it might do is a waste of power so by the way we pumped it full of ads and subscriptions"


linear
@linear

i do not think this is specific to computers, but rather that it is a symptom of a broader cultural eradication of whimsy in all things


pnictogen-wing
@pnictogen-wing

totally agree. when I was growing up screensavers were more of a Mac thing, i.e. a "toy computer" thing, and then when LCD screens became commonplace that was an excuse for getting rid of 'em, even though all display technologies are liable to photobleaching, I would suspect. it's more of a problem with OLEDs, however. ~Chara


ireneista
@ireneista

in our computing and otherwise

for this exact reason

edit to add: *ago


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @lapisnev's post:

that's... a good way to put it, like there was this huge push to make everything efficient and why not just shut off the screen but the other half is eating up any kind of efficiency gains with ads and chromium in application trenchcoats and nagware built into the OS so now it's like fuck, why can't we just run the pipes screensaver

(is anyone porting xscreensaver stuff to wayland shit?)

lol I wonder if MS do this to game their efficiency numbers in a very literal since they started plastering carbon offsets on half the settings options and on their website and product details.

nothing to benefit the user, very little energy saved with modern displays, but in aggregate let's you lie about co2 because idling computers aren't running the display, but modern computers are idle half the day or more

nah screensavers 'died' a slow death on Windows way before Microsoft started acting like they care about carbon emissions. the screensaver settings pane in Windows 11 still looks the same as it did in Vista

xscreensaver is a wonder. i don't use my linux lappy a whole lot so probably 98% of the time its life's purpose is to sit there and play an animation of 4d double rotations or an outside in type beat or moosay the time and date or even display fake error messages and so on. it's almost certainly not necessary for the screen at all, but it's so valuable to me (plus it pulls double duty by auto-locking the computer after a certain period of time). i've been meaning to figure out making my own ones for that thing

in reply to @linear's post:

They could get away with dropping it, so they did. The only features they have any interest in retaining are 1) ones that benefit advertisers (including themselves) and 2) those whose loss would cause people to stop using Windows. And they're not that concerned about #2.

in reply to @ireneista's post: