psilocervine

but wife city is two words

56k warning


cohost (arknights)
cohost.org/arkmints

erica
@erica

Two weeks ago, I (accidentally) clicked into my Patreon analytics page and was kinda stunlocked by what I saw.

A quick note that "Patreon" on here means people coming from email updates, iOS/Android app notifications, or I assume just typing my patreon link and finding the post that way? Probably just the former 2.

Surely that can't be right? Fourty-nine percent of clickthroughs to my Patreon content comes from Cohost? Twitter doesn't even rank anymore??

I had a split second of being truly stunned until I remembered: I stopped linking to my stuff on Twitter because, well, Twitter's dying, right? Dead website, nobody clicks links, you have to censor P*treon and c0mmission and all that stuff, right? After a second to regain clarity I was still, like, sorta shocked cuz like... my Patreon's doing fine! My numbers haven't spiked or dropped any significant amount, it's just been keepin' on at regularly good numbers because I've been doing regularly good stuff. At least, that was my thought.

Still, I was really curious. I wanted to see where all my traffic would come from if I linked in equal amounts everywhere that I post. So for the next two weeks, the period of time measured that Patreon forces me into for measuring traffic, I linked everything and checked in to see how things were doing. I'll outline the two-week "experiment" past the jump cuz it gets a bit long but before that, here's where my numbers are after two weeks.

Here's details about how it shook out this way:


erica
@erica

sharing this because of sorta prescient conversation about twitter. twitter is still a really great place for being a spark but like any good engine you need a couple cylinders to go anywhere good and you gotta build those yourself

or you can be content with a 1-cylinder engine i guess idk do what you want. people got so much data now on best practises now but folks truly will not listen/do what provides them the best confirmation bias to their already held beliefs. it is what it is!


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @erica's post:

I also don't have more detailed info on where specifically people are coming from, which posts get the most traffic, etc. because Patreon doesn't share that data for some reason.

webdev nerd chiming in - patreon is almost certainly getting that data from the Referer header in requests to patreon. websites like twitter and whatever can control what specifically gets put in there, but i took a quick check and most places are just leaving the browser default setting, which is to send only the origin (ie. the domain name and protocol, like https://twitter.com), and not the rest of the url (bit of a simplification, more detail here if you want). so the reason patreon isn't surfacing traffic per post is likely just because it doesn't get that information.

if you do want that info - does patreon support UTM parameters in it's analytics platform? could be a viable option if they do, just chuck the parameters in the links to patreon you post. otherwise, that might just be data you can't get, unfortunately.

I can't say since I'm not a webdev person but according to its help page, it does have a better analytics page that some users have access to but based on the imagine it's showing it just seems like a different graph readout so I don't know.

It's very possible they just simply don't collect that data which, idk, if I was building a platform where people had to optimize certain things to make a living, I'd sorta make that a priority? It's data that platforms like Gumroad and Itch offer with no sweat, at least.

Regardless of whatever other parameters they have, they necessarily would be able to track per-post analytics because the people are visiting different pages. Can’t necessarily see exactly what link got someone there, but you can still see what page they entered via.

ohhhhh wait did i misread this and get it the other way around? i thought this was talking about breakdown by source page, not by patreon post. now that i think about it, both of those kinda give the same information, bc there's usually a one-to-one link between post on a given social media platform <-> patreon post. so yea, patreon should really be able to surface that info. pretty stinky that it doesn't, that really shouldn't be that hard

cohost to me is the embodiment of "don't try to find the biggest audience; try to find your audience". users here wont 1. be here or 2. follow you unless they really care about your stuff. i've found, at least

Just gonna say I’m a bit envious since I’ve tried to get a documentary (on Pokemon Mystery Dungeon, which i spent most of 2022 on) shared around like crazy here and elsewhere all year and it just flops like a fish, each and every time i share it. So for video content I don’t think Cohost or the community is that friendly to that kind of content

Some of my writing content has done OKish if I link it here however, but I notice people who get more stuff seen are usually those who end up getting lucky with a tag that works and is picked up by those browsing it (which for me is tough to find most of the time for certain niche subjects) or have a lot of followers (and can get away with tagging mistakes)

Generally i notice my content does better via Opencritic more than here, but with me abandoning my twitter, even my occasional shares here outpaces Twitter easily. I’m hoping the site makes it easier to discover content creators soon rather than just through the shoddy tag system

I'm sorry to hear you've had mixed experiences! Like I said, this is very specific to my situation so I can't really say I vouch for this being, like, concrete data.

If I had to levy a criticism on here it'd certainly echo what you said, though. Discoverability is, I think, purposefully a bit more of an effort because it contributes to the "the stuff you see, you'll care about because you found it", but that doesn't mean it needs to be as arcane as it is in some situations. Stuff like tag association would go a long way.

oh yeah definitely; my biggest roadblock is knowing which video game tag to put when talking about gaming stuff so i just lump a bunch of em lol

much easier to do say, platform specific tags like NES or whatnot than Video Games or Video Gaming or Videogame, and i feel some sort of "official tag" for big topics would help tons.

This is really neat to see, really impressive work.
I'm not gonna name names but an artist I followed for a while announced a bit ago that they were leaving twit for good and moving to bsky so I mentioned to them that I would love to see them on cohost more and they responded with something like (I don't have the exact words because they seem to have fully deleted their twitter so the post is gone) "cohost is a joke, i'm here to run my business not to have fun" and I think it just sucks that for various reasons people don't see it as a viable platform.

really cool to hear how good cohost is for everything.

my one note is that I think tracking analytics like this are broken for tumblr. it's my main audience by several thousands and despite getting lots of notes and comments on posts linking to my comic, my site's host and itch's referral stats don't show it.

yeah i'd remembered the same which made it weird!

i just spent the last little bit testing it on a placeholder page my site and it appears that tumblr clicks show up as direct links and won't have a referrer. this is the same whether the click is from the dashboard, a tumblr.com/blog popout page or on a blog.tumblr.com page.

your alt text

For someone who doesn't like to do this kind of thing, you did the thing remarkably well! And I'm saying this as someone who's been educated in how to do good tests/experience + collect and interpret data and does this in part for a living. Obviously your mileage may vary, but, that's honestly just the way it goes. Framing the data in context is always crucial and your writeup was more mindful of that than most dry-ass science papers I've read that really suck at telling a story, acknowledging limitations, or making readers care (or some combination of the three).

Besides, all of the data driven recommendations in the world will never be more important than "do you actually want to do the thing for reasons other than big number go up". I'm willing to bet that the folks who badgered you about doing x, y, or z probably forget this a lot.

Thanks so much for writing this up! Caveats aside, it's good to see some data that seems to affirm some of the stuff Cohost is proving to be good for.

It's not all the way there yet in terms of discovery, but it's more than just a place to be when you don't care about discovery.

so incredibly relieved for the addendum bringing up tiktok. everyone has insisted that it's the place to be for music, but it has only ever appeared to be a pure black hole for content or relevance and just such a massive waste of time and i thought i was just crazy

i do think the technical side of things also helps or hurts adoption of certain kinds of creative work. bluesky offers no audio or video or embed support so it blows unless you're posting artwork which is the bulk of the posts i ever see on there. i just don't have a whole lot of faith that it will maintain its current community once they start opening up on a wider scale

thank you for posting honest numbers and your detailed evaluation and observations. it's hard to extrapolate a lot of things from Numbers, but you've managed to gleam some useful insights!

I genuinely thought I was nuts for thinking that about TikTok too but the more I used it, the more it made me think of the time Facebook admitted to gassing up video numbers and making everyone pivot to that form of content, decimating online media/journalism in the process.

I don't think TikTok is lying about numbers on their videos because some stuff I'd post there would just simply not track, but I don't think the numbers mean anything there. What difference does 3k, 30k, or 300k plays make if none of those people have a link to click to check out my stuff elsewhere?

I follow a lot of artists on Patreon, and my primary way of interacting with their work is that the Patreon app and Gmail will send me push notifications, I'll go retweet the art if it's posted there, and then like a freak I go log on to my computer to visit the post by clicking through the email link so I can see it on a bigger screen. I guess that would put me in the "Patreon" group lmao.

Love this post! Thanks for laying it all out. I've been feeling bleakly pessimistic about illustration as a career because of all the nonsense going on with tech and social media lately.

I think write-ups like this help give hope! It definitely seems like artists need to pick their strategy and drill down on it.

Some questions I thought of...

  1. How much does Pixiv/Fanbox contribute to your livelihood would you say?

  2. I feel like people all act like TikTok is the place "with the huge audience" but I'm curious if you've heard of any artist having success with clickthrough rates on there. I hate the idea of artists having to jump through tiktok hoops by appearing on camera or doing timelapse videos.

Pixiv/Fanbox is a fraction of what I make on Patreon, but it's also where I upload HQ nsfw art so it's boosted up more than most, I think. It only exports (for Westerners) through Paypal so they take a cut of each pledge, monthly transfer, and transfer to my bank account. Which sucks. But it's an OK alternative to have.

Super interesting stuff! I feel like the numbers demonstrate some great things about cohost.

When it comes Patreon email clickthroughs, I usually just see the email and then navigate to the app/website instead of opening the email and clicking through there. Maybe that’s just a me thing, but if not, it might partially explain the lower-than-expected Patreon traffic?

This is such a good write up- thank you for this! Also I have an extremely stupid question: how the hell are you finding this analytics info? This is something I’ve literally emailed Patreon about adding and they never told me it actually existed already. 🙃

Just wanted to say thanks for doing all the legwork and getting all that data! Some part of me wonders how much tagging on patreon/co-host affects things, but I doubt there's any way to really find those analytics. (I just assume no one uses hashtags on Twitter at this point lol)

It's hard to say, yeah. I tag on Patreon for sorting purposes and I tag on here pretty lightly just so people can get to the immediate thing the art is about if they're interested (i.e.: "bunny suit" but not "anime girl" or other generalized tags)

Tagging on here is the most meaningful means of discoverability so I'm sure it helps to some degree but it's hard to quantify and honestly I'm not hard pressed to find out either because part of the freedom of this place is that I think the gains from minmaxing stuff like that is probably pretty minimal.

I know that when it comes to Patreon email links, I don't have Patreon logged in on my phone, so if I'm out of the house & check my email & see one from someone, once I get home, I'll go straight to their page to see the post in full on my home computer. So yeah, I'm often visiting without going through the email links, even if do use those emails as notifications.

I have no way of knowing because Patreon won't share the data but I do wonder if that also counts as "Patreon" traffic. Either way, I'm surprised at the number of folks who've shared they do this exact thing so thanks for reassuring me that the low(er) number is mostly circumstantial in this case!

This is really helpful insight, thanks for sharing this! I've been running my Patreon for a little over a year now and I didn't even think about whether Patreon had these features hiding in the analytics page until you mentioned it. My page has been mostly focused on nsfw stuff so it very likely differs in engagement (over 70% of my traffic is coming from patreon itself with the rest listed as a nebulous "other"), but cohost still played what I felt was a big part in helping me find my footing early on, so it's nice to see more data backing up my personal estimates.

This write up is awesome! Was the push I think I needed to try dedicating a little bit more brainpower into using and building my cohost page!

When sharing the link in your replies on twitter instead of the main post, did you notice any deboosting regardless? It's something I've avoided altogether out of fear of the posts doing badly ;3;

in reply to @erica's post:

One thing I feel the need to point out is that, the way Patreon tracks the traffic and where it comes from... doesn't quite work with Tumblr. Cause tumblr just sends you through to the link instead of trying to note that it comes from tumblr. I have seen that kind of stuff with various friends and friends-of-friends that use tumblr as their primary platform and somehow had like 70% "Other" and 30% twitter (paraphrasing) on their analytics. So it's not impossible that the 34% "Other" might be coming from your tumblr.

given the overall metrics of my posts on tumblr i find that beyond unlikely. it was brought up in the comments of the original post—it's very likely it does post some traffic, but friends have largely told me the same thing of their experience on tumblr as of late which is that nobody really clicks shit on there anymore if you're selling stuff.