I’m pessimistic about this, even if it is true.
Why?
Superconductors are bombs.
They’re fantastic at storing current but they have a little thing called a critical current density. You can only put so much current into one before it stops being superconducting. And electrical currents don’t just stop. It will generate more or less whatever voltage is necessary for the current to dissipate into heat, and then, of course, the entire superconductor is superconducting no longer. If you’ve seen people making sparks with flyback converters from CRTs or made out of microwave transformers, picture something similar, but a lot bigger.
So if the superconductor cracks or gets overloaded with current, it can explode.
Naturally, existing commercial superconducting systems either come nowhere close to this limit, or have failsafes up the wazoo, like multiple redundant coils and big shunt resistors that can absorb the current without melting anything or blowing anyone up, but I don’t trust any failsafe to be 100% effective, especially in an accident. Oh, and they can always be disabled if you try hard enough.
Battery fires are scary, but at least a Tesla doesn’t contain as much energy as a normal gas tank, and at least gasoline needs air and time to burn.
And lastly, I think the state would be a little concerned about people making off with the stuff from construction sites, so the material could potentially be highly regulated. Not to mention how horribly expensive it would be to re-wire a major transmission corridor.
Big magnets of all sorts would still be cool, though, for everything from MRIs you can sit down in, to electric motors and generators for hybrid-electric planes and cars, to particle accelerators, to electric rockets, to frighteningly powerful free-electron lasers, to giving the folks at ITER a very hectic bunch of meetings…