So I've started doing the required viewing for the film school I'm planning on applying to and thought it would be fun to post the reviews here. I'll be watching one movie from each director on the viewing list and I've decided to only watch films I haven't seen before to make it more interesting for myself. I'll try to watch at least one movie a day. Not sure how long this thread will become but there's at least 30 movies to go through and I'll probably watch more so it should be fun.

Charlie Chaplin has a Joker moment, becomes a communist, does drugs, beats up many police officers, becomes Italian and evades the law. There's a restaurant sequence near the end that may have inspired Jacques Tati's Playtime. Not my favorite Chaplin movie but there's lots of cool gags, especially since I've seen the behind the scenes stuff.

7/10

I did not expect bro to astral project half way through the film. I like how Chaplin and Keaton are both silent film comedy directors who worked in the same time period but you can still find differences between their styles. It was only 45 minutes but it was charming and kind of funny.

6/10

"Can I have some borscht?"

"Yes, but only a spoonful."

I liked this one a lot more than the other Eisenstein movie I watched, October. Some characters are even named. However, the main character is really the collective, in this movie being the sailors. It's interesting how Buster Keaton wanted to use as little title cards as possible in his movies, but in this movie the title cards are there for scenes where it's definitely not necessary. They're almost like poetry because they describe the events on-screen in a very artistic way. This movie definitely shows of the strengths of Soviet Montage Theory.

6/10

Homeless people save the day. Very impressive movie for its time. I liked the use of sound as a method of creating tension. Some scenes felt a bit too dragged out but it doesn't hurt the movie too much. The film is left open-ended, mainly because what happens to the murderer doesn't matter. Death sentence or the asylum, neither of those things will bring those dead children back.

8/10

I'm not a fan of westers or John Ford, but I chose this movie because it's a caravan film with an ensemble cast, in the hopes that I'll enjoy it. Suffice to say, I did not. While the character dynamics are entertaining at times, the film still has the same western tropes as others from that time period. Sadly, I was simply just bored.

3/10

Classic noir film. The plot takes a bit to get interesting but the dialogue is so enjoyable and snappy that it tides you over until the interesting bits start. Godard's Breathless makes a lot more sense after watching this film. The actual mystery of the plot honestly isn't that interesting, but I definitely enjoyed this movie for its characters.

7/10

Average Balkan grandma simulator Alfred Hitchcock don't have a blonde woman fetish challenge (he failed). Very fun film. The mystery actually left me guessing for most of the movie. Great example of his famous "bomb theory".

7/10

Bro is kafkaesque. This movie was great. It perfectly captured the dreamlike vibe of Kafka’s work and had interesting and striking visuals throughout its entire 2 hour runtime. The opening story, dictated by Welles himself, was a really good way to start the film and instantly grabbed my attention. The film was also party filmed in Zagreb, the capital of my home country Croatia and that gives it bonus points because I’m biased and I don’t care. Actually enjoyed this movie more than Citizen Kane and now I’m honestly excited to watch more Welles films.

9/10

Watching this WWI movie after All Quiet on the Western Front is a bit of a jarring experience. This movie is a lot lighter, yet it still has those faint hints of tragedy that every war film needs a little of in my opinion. The characters were all memorable and the escape attempts were fun to watch. I can see why it’s a French classic.

7.5/10

I expected this movie to go a lot harder with how controversial it was in its time. Imagine disrespecting Christianity so much the Pope had to step in. Lots of interesting visuals in the movie. Must admit, I found Buñuel’s other films more interesting but this one wasn’t bad either.

6/10

What the dog doin’? Wasn’t looking forward to watching this film due to how depressing Italian neorealism tends to be. However, I was pleasantly surprised by a heartfelt and beautiful story with tons of human scenes. One sequence in particular really lingers on one of the characters and their routine and it’s so simple yet also captivating and moving. The ending was very suspenseful because I wasn’t expecting a happy ending from a neorealist film. I really liked it, although it does feel a bit shallow due to none of the main character’s problems actually being solved. Too bad I don’t actually care, FLIKE IS BEST DOG

8/10

here is what leafo said on discord:

(re someone asking about the email and this particular post)

Looks like they shared the entire notice we sent to some accounts. I don't have anything else to add on top of that as I think it accurately describes the situation.

...

When you opt your account into our payouts system, you are asking us to take on the liability of selling your work on all of our merchant accounts, payment processing services, etc. As described in the email, there are many factors that contribute to the risk associated with running an account for someone. Our goal is to enable the most creators to use our service as possible. However, when a seller knowingly shares content that may pose potential issues, it becomes unfair to the rest of the creators we serve.

I try to avoid mentioning revenue share in these types of discussions, as we aren't asking people to set their rev share to anything specific to get access. But, the arrangement I described above can be especially disheartening when many of these sellers also set their rev share to 0. I'm fairly sure the devs are very much aware of the risks and are purely taking advantage of the situation. It's a lose-lose situation for itch.io. Unfortunately that leaves us in a tricky position and we sometimes need to make the difficult decision about what accounts are eligible for certain features.

Hope that gives you some clarity about our process.

(when asked if any particular revshare would resolve the problem)

Please re-read my message. We are not asking accounts to set their revshare to anything specific.

so here is what it smells like is happening, to me:

itch is already in a precarious position due to acting as, essentially, porn laundering — you can't sell explicit stuff through paypal, but you can slap it on itch and have people buy it through paypal there

so i'm guessing they had to jettison a relatively small number of devs for a combination of reasons, which i speculate could include

• only having nsfw games
• disproportionately many chargebacks (something porn is infamous for, big reason merchants hate it)
• having low revenue share
• themes that a guy in a suit somewhere may find dubious
• god knows what else

in which case there... can't... really be a clear line, because the line is just "is worth the risk to collect payments for". even if there were a line that were somehow quantifiable, at best that would get them to "the risk we've determined these devs pose is exactly balanced out by how much money they give us" which is still not great

again i don't actually know anything beyond the quotes above (and leafo has not commented either way on any of my speculation), but this makes the most sense to me. it is not an ideal situation, but i trust leafo enough to assume there are multiple conflicting forces and it is infeasible to explain them all publicly

it certainly doesn't look at all like itch is ending all adult game sales. i mean, it would be completely ridiculous to do that by emailing one dev at a time

sneps