I was going to make a post about Honeycomb being a joint-cognitive systems company, so I went to look joint-cognitive systems up to make sure I was getting it right. The first page of results was all paywalled, either journals or books. I'm sure I could find it somewhere else but I think I'll just stop using the term. If folks who hear it from me can't google it, they aren't going to keep digging. Maybe it's time I read some cybernetics texts... the problem I have is that these things are usually immediately obvious to me, and I'm just here to pillage their language to teach people from more angles. I think if I say "BubbleUp is a cybernetic product", people will understand immediately, whatever the experts say.
aka MissAmyTobey
- she/her
Amy Tobey💙parent🦁🐶🐈obligate polymath🎶sr principal engineer🧙♀️chaotic good🌈trans buckaroo🏳️⚧️backyard yogi🧘♀️魔法 少女🤦🏻♀️neurodivergent🧠she/her💙
You must log in to comment.
in reply to @renice's post:
On one hand I'd tell people to just use sci-hub, but you make a good point, there's also something inherently a bit alienating about terminology that seems to be entirely used by academics who publish in Elsevier 🙃
Many people would get it. But I'll be honest that it took me a long time to come around to the idea that like, people and their smart phones are already cyborgs. I'm not sure that everyone is there.