sadteaparty

probably still getting by.

i hope you're well.



bitto
@bitto

trying to maintain a garden is tough work. while a farm or a garden can exist in many sizes or different concentrations, or even many structures of ownership, a garden is definitely a humbler enterprise. gardens are definitely also a much tighter coupling of the functional and ornamental that you won't find expressed in farms squeezed by multiple generations of agriculture, like the kitchen gardens that victorian cooks would retreat to for ingredients, or the tea gardens that hosted noon brunches of cucumber sandwiches. pleasure gardens existed as ticketed greenery spaces for middle class londoners to soak in the dazzling wealth of nobles. other gardens are instead amazing showpieces of our ability to bend nature, like the baroque gardens or botanical gardens split by winding walkways, or even the well groomed lawns and flower beds of suburbia. some gardens instead demonstrate an obvious moral agency, like the victory gardens that were encouraged during the world wars to ease the strain from rationing, which were envisioned not only as good for sustenance but as an effective booster for civil morale. every garden may not be grown for such a noble purpose, but every garden does demonstrate a commitment to some allotment of space that says something just as valuable about the person that grew it.

if we're to say gardens are limited to creative arrangements, then cottage personal sites are probably no better a reflection of that idea in the digital world. knowing how broadly a garden can be classified, though, I find it far more useful to liken digital gardens to BBSes. unlike personal sites that might offer at best a guestbook or a shoutbox, BBSes have always existed as true meeting places and destinations by people for a variety of purposes, from their days as long-distance dial-ins to more contemporary offshoots as textboards and imageboards. they are almost always administered by individuals or small teams, and that wisdom certainly holds today, which makes them look very different to most other platforms that exist to invite participation online. while historically they were used to play games, to download cracked software, to exchange pornography, or to fling casual banter, in reality, each BBS developed an identity around whatever its owner cultivated it as. just as a community garden might only be something to observe or stroll through for most people, a BBS extends the same flexibility as one where neighbors can go to collaborate, where a lone devotee can tirelessly keep it alive, or where its surroundings can become overgrown with weeds or flame wars. small textboards, imageboards, and forums carry this same homegrown heritage today, right down to their ramshackled software, that makes them exist as oddities on a monolithic web where discussion is funneled to happen in either a feed or a chatroom — your choice. they are the surviving communal gardens of a web where all surrounding sites have grown into or aspire to be content farms.

the cambridge cyber gardening club (CCGC), as the name makes obvious, is subsequently a digital garden at its most direct. here, there is only one flow of discussions in reverse chronological order, not unlike the flat discussion hierarchy pioneered by ayashii world that inspired 2ch and the developments that followed it. while you are free to take a look at past posts, you can only participate by sending a post card in the mail with whatever you want to say written on it to an address in boston. there, someone will scan your card and post it to the site for everyone else to see. if you're a bigot or a nuisance, someone will sort your post to the compost pile, where that shitpost will hopefully fertilize a better one in the future. it fashions itself as an imageboard, but that's obviously mostly in name given how deliberately at odds it exists with the concept. with each post going as far as obfuscating its post number and timestamp with roman numerals, it's clear that each entry is an attempt to slow your gaze, to appreciate each post as a whole. posters dedicated enough to get something into the mail have no trouble translating those numbers so they can backlink to replies in their own personal chicken scratch, but you'll have to diligently follow along and read each post after yours to see if anyone might have had anything to say back to you. a watched garden never sprouts, but it's especially fulfilling when it does on a timeline like this.

functionally, this concept could have existed without the web if anyone ever thought to publish reader conversations like letters to the editor. existing on the web as it does among other imageboards and textboards that launched alongside it is probably the only way it could have been imagined, however. before 4chan converged on near-real time posting made possible by browser extensions that delivered new posts inline and alerted you to replies, its core users were seeded from forums where hammering on F5 to follow conversations was the expected default. while it's barely thought about today, real time posting was an innovation introduced years after 4chan's launch that saw users begin to favor threads that acted more like small chatrooms — the emergence of "generals" — rather than independent threads that attracted unique audiences each time. 4chan may have once defined itself as the web's counterculture, but it could not defy an audience that demanded more posts, more quickly from consumption patterns they had become accustomed to experiencing on the mainstream web. no one that had tasted the firehose wanted to go back to a slower method of engaging with posts.

the CCGC garden is just one example that emerged after this shift, as did many other unique imageboard concepts that followed in the wake of 4chan's success (much as 4chan itself set out to imitate the successes of 2ch and futaba). one of them retains posts only for a day, envisioned as fleeting conversations with strangers at a bus stop. another lets you post only during a set window of tea time each day. the CCGC garden is one of my favorites, as it feels almost like a sneering step around any users that would ever demand more posts from a digital medium effectively having slow mode applied to it by snail mail. certainly, these sites can never hope to replace other platforms, and they're deliberately obtuse and a little strange by design, but that makes them far more charming to steep yourself in and appreciate. rather than welcome an unflinchingly fast churn of content, these examples have taken a deliberate approach that slows posting to a meditation rather than a sprint. in much the same ilk, a post to a site like cohost might present more friction to publish, but each post holds more weight to it as a result. the CCGC garden is considerably less healthy at only a few posts each year, yet it persists because there is at least one person to steward what it stands for, to exist as a counterweight to the prevailing modes of communication that happen online even if only as an artistic curiosity. there is no chance that the CCGC garden ever supplants anything, or probably even develops a serious audience, and that's okay. tending a garden doesn't have to put your garden in competition to become the best, or the biggest, or the most profitable garden. letting it grow a community, or fall back to the earth, or inspire someone else, should be enough.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @bitto's post:

I had no idea these kinds of ephemerata existed on the Internet—this is so neat.

Spiritually, I’m drawn to those kinds of communities that are small and difficult to use; it’s a subtle way of designing a community of people who are patient and willing to engage with the community’s rules.

Something that comes to mind as a loose parallel is the way reservations are handled where I live. In this case, the overly complicated process is not only due to design; it’s because many business owners don’t trust/know about online reservation systems OR they need a verbal/written confirmation from a person that they will abide by their restaurant/cafe/office’s rules so they go for the most manual choice.

Some examples include:

  • Clicking a link to “open reservations” and then sending a blank email to an email address listed on the website.
  • Emailing an email address a week before you wish to come; the staff will send you a secret sign up page where it is “first come first serve” for all the other people who have emailed them before
  • Buying a special “return postage” postcard and sending it to the establishment with some dates you are available; they will circle one and send the postcard back to you

Though the processes are sometimes annoyingly opaque and all different, there’s a sense of accomplishment and camraderie I have when I make these reservations. I wonder if other folks in these communities experience this, too.

I’m curious to know if you’ve participated in these kinds of sites before, and if so—what did it feel like to say, see a postcard of yours you sent, or accessing the teatime website at tea time?

that's an interesting analog equivalent to think about! I've heard of specific restaurants using snail mail reservations as a way to develop their halo of exclusivity, but I can't say I've heard of it being the defacto approach (though maybe this is more the case in parts of the developing world). snail mail does present a friction in this context, but it's also still one of the most abundantly accessible forms of communication, even moreso than broadband or telephone. to me that communicates that these restaurants want to retain some level of open access, even when they could just as easily lock down into a speakeasy if the main goal was to benefit from the postive effects of filtering out undesirable clientele. you could make a similar comparison to the way many private trackers operate mainly by relying on invite systems, yet also retain a way for new users to prove entry through a rigorous interview.

most of my experience with cottage communities like these has been informed by an ethnography approach, so I probably do a lot more lurking than participating myself, but I'll have to leave you to guess which CCGC postcard was mine. with smaller bulletin boards like CCGC, where the audience is almost nonexistant, it feels a bit like dropping a message in a bottle that you never expect to see an answer from. appointment sites like bus stop and /tea/ instead seem to nurture more direct community, as they are almost like clubs that meet at a specified time in function and have specific ecologies that you almost don't want to intrude on. I'm reminded especially of how 4chan users used to informally refer to times each day on that site as "american time" or "european time", where it was only feasible to be active during those hours from a specific locale, so it's interesting to consider that these sites have effectively internalized that concept in their structure. so many small communities were born from a 4chan diaspora that was overwhelemed with how large that site has gotten over time, so I don't think it's an accident that many of them have also chosen to limit posting in unique ways to prevent uncurious wanderers. the friction is certainly a huge part in why I find them interesting to begin with when anyone can easily clone a forum or a BBS that presents no barrier to entry at all, other than its own obscurity.