Why Don't We Just Kill the Kid In the Omelas Hole

Sharks are cool and comfortable!
Elden Thing | Back & Body Hurts Platinugggggh Rewards Member
Profile pic and banner credits: sharkaeopteryx art by @superkiak! eggbug by eggbug! Mash-up by me!
[Alt-text for pfp: a cute sharkaeopteryx sat on the ground with legs out, wings down, jaw ajar, and hed empty, looking at eggbug and eggbug's enigmatic smile.]
[Alt-text for banner: a Spirit Halloween banner with eggbug and the sharkaeopteryx that Superkiak drew for me looking at it with inscrutable expressions]
I'm a Vietnamese cis woman born and currently living in the U.S. You may know me from Sandwich, from Twitter or Mastodon (same username), or on Twitch as Sharkaeopteryx. I do not have a Discord or Bluesky account.
Ask me about language learning/teaching, cooking/eating food, late diagnosis ADHD, and volunteer small business mentoring. Or don't, I'm not the boss of you.
I think people deserve to be young, make mistakes, and grow without being held to standards they don't know about yet and are still learning. So, if you are under 22, please don't try to strike up a friendship or get involved in discussions on my posts.
Please don't automatically assume I follow/know/co-sign someone just because I reposted something from them—sometimes I do, sometimes I don't. Also, if you think being removed as a follower when we're not mutuals is a cardinal sin, please do not follow me.
Why Don't We Just Kill the Kid In the Omelas Hole
i'm a sucker for any sort of story which can deconstruct and play with a metaphor while also totally, 100% treating it literally
"load-bearing omelas child" is going to stick in my head for years, i can tell
...Somehow, it was this post that reminded me that Princess Emeraude, whom I referenced in my earlier comment, is literally called "The Pillar of Cephiro."
Fantastic short story. The line "You can’t kill me in any way that matters." had me howling because it's a Tumblr meme that makes perfect sense in context.
The gut reaction of "why don't they just take the kid out of the hole instead of killing them?" And the absolutely crushing dread because as a writer, I know why.
Because it doesn't even occur to them. I'm struggling to put it in words the right way, but it's a lot about what the story is digging at, as well. There's never a point where the children have any agency, they become abstracted away from being an individual living thing very quickly. Look at how quickly the cycle of killing accelerates towards a kind of normalcy.
Taking the kid out of the hole requires empathy, and requires facing up to the atrocity that's being done. If they kill the kid, sure the disasters happen, but maybe the cycle will break this time. There's two scenarios that taking the kid out of the hole could lead to, two major ones anyway. One: the disasters don't happen, the kid's alive, and every death that happened was not only unjust, but could have been triggering the disasters. It was all pointless. Two: you take the kid out of the hole, the disaster still happen, and now standing in front of you is someone whose suffering is your fault, and due to them not being in the hole, not serving some greater purpose. You could shove them back in the hole. Maybe it'd fix things. Maybe it wouldn't.
The shorter version of this answer is that it drives home the themes and points of the story. It is the thing that could do, but they never would. They won't. It's part of what drives this whole thing home for me.