Sharks are cool and comfortable!


Elden Thing | Back & Body Hurts Platinugggggh Rewards Member


Profile pic and banner credits: sharkaeopteryx art by @superkiak! eggbug by eggbug! Mash-up by me!
[Alt-text for pfp: a cute sharkaeopteryx sat on the ground with legs out, wings down, jaw ajar, and hed empty, looking at eggbug and eggbug's enigmatic smile.]
[Alt-text for banner: a Spirit Halloween banner with eggbug and the sharkaeopteryx that Superkiak drew for me looking at it with inscrutable expressions]


I'm a Vietnamese cis woman born and currently living in the U.S. You may know me from Sandwich, from Twitter or Mastodon (same username), or on Twitch as Sharkaeopteryx. I do not have a Discord or Bluesky account.

Ask me about language learning/teaching, cooking/eating food, late diagnosis ADHD, and volunteer small business mentoring. Or don't, I'm not the boss of you.


I think people deserve to be young, make mistakes, and grow without being held to standards they don't know about yet and are still learning. So, if you are under 22, please don't try to strike up a friendship or get involved in discussions on my posts.


Please don't automatically assume I follow/know/co-sign someone just because I reposted something from them—sometimes I do, sometimes I don't. Also, if you think being removed as a follower when we're not mutuals is a cardinal sin, please do not follow me.


🐘Mastodon
search for @sharksonaplane@mastodon.sandwich.net and hit follow if you want
Hang out with me on the Auldnoir forum! (you can DM there!)
discourse.auldnoir.org/
Follow me on Twitch
twitch.tv/sharkaeopteryx
Add my RSS feed (not working yet but I'll get to it!)
sharkaeopteryx.neocities.org/rss.xml

Adell
@Adell

They literally admit this shit won't work WHY DO IT THEN

Generative AI technology is designed to generate text in response to any prompt, regardless of whether it “knows” the answer or not. However, by asking DuckAssist to only summarize information from Wikipedia and related sources, the probability that it will “hallucinate” — that is, just make something up — is greatly diminished. In all cases though, a source link, usually a Wikipedia article, will be linked below the summary, often pointing you to a specific section within that article so you can learn more.

Nonetheless, DuckAssist won’t generate accurate answers all of the time. We fully expect it to make mistakes. Because there’s a limit to the amount of information the feature can summarize, we use the specific sentences in Wikipedia we think are the most relevant; inaccuracies can happen if our relevancy function is off, unintentionally omitting key sentences, or if there’s an underlying error in the source material given. DuckAssist may also make mistakes when answering especially complex questions, simply because it would be difficult for any tool to summarize answers in those instances. That’s why it’s so important for our users to share feedback during this beta phase: there’s an anonymous feedback link next to all DuckAssist answers where you can let us know about any problems, so we can identify where things aren’t working well and take quick steps to make improvements.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Adell's post:

To answer the question of "they say it won't work so why do it", the answer is twofold:

  1. They already dropped A LOT of money into this research. Tech companies are shoveling cash into the burning trash fire that is "generative AI." Sunk cost fallacy is in full effect. Facebook never stopped running the Metaverse despite it being a massive failure. As a matter of fact, they're trying to save it with "generative AI." That's going...poorly, but better than it should because investors are in an "AI Bubble." This is like the "Dotcom Bubble." Simply slap "AI" onto your product and investors will throw money into it convinced that one of their investments will pay off. Because that certainly worked out great the last few times. So, a lot of money is being dropped and people are burning it and getting more to burn with the buzzword.

  2. Tech NEEDS AI to exist. It can't be understated that Tech is in a weird spot. People rally around Alpahabet (Google) the announcing its first Dividend ever. But it all covers up one clear thing: tech isn't what investors thought it would be. Or, more accurately, it isn't that when a lot of the bells and whistles are taken away. The core of tech does not justify its massive oodles of cash. They had a soft push to reality right BEFORE AI was announced, when Tech was beginning to lose VC money. AI saved them from crashing down to reality. Tech companies know this for a fact. They need AI to be real, true, and good. Because, otherwise, what do they have? Streaming companies that overspend and lose out to piracy the more they try to raise their profits? Social media that is aging out and dying, constantly in a losing battle as they try to balance advertiser needs and customer needs? A slew of products that they have to increasingly make worse and less permanent to ring out an extra few bucks out of the customer by making them pay more frequently? It's not exactly exciting stuff. If AI wasn't here, the downward spiral when VC was pulling out wouldn't have stopped and tech would have turned into any other industry, with VC money floating about the market more evenly. If AI fails BEFORE they can spin their plates long enough to get the next scam out, they'll have a hard crash. And, in the back of their mind, the people at the top know this. Thus, they are trying to WILL AI into existence by forcing it into everything they can until its uqitious and cannot be stopped. Let's hope they fail.