shel

The Transsexual Chofetz Chaim

Mutant, librarian, poet, union rabble rouser, dog, Ashkenazi Jewish. Neuroweird, bodyweird, mostly sleepy.


I write about transformative justice, community, love, Judaism, Neurodivergence, mental health, Disability, geography, rivers, labor, and libraries; through poetry, opinionated essays, and short fiction.


I review Schoolhouse Rock! songs at @PropagandaRock


Website (RSS + Newsletter)
shelraphen.com/

Trying to figure out how to define to term neurodivergent as part of a labor organizing project and finding it really challenging.

An accurate linguistic descriptivist definition would be something like...

Neurodivergent is a term referring to people whose brain development diverged from the expected norm. It is most commonly used by Autistic people and people with ADHD as a way to refer to their shared community in a less medical manner. While it is almost exclusively used by Autistic people and ADHDers, they insist that it's an open label anyone can identify with regardless of what their specific medical diagnosis would be, including people with chronic depression, OCD, anxiety, schizophrenia, bipolar, and even substance use disorders and eating disorders. Sometimes people in those other groups will take the invitation to identify as neurodivergent but most of the time they don't because they perceive the term neurodivergent as being a euphemism for ADHD and Autism.

Like it's hard to accurately define it in a way that maintains a professional tone, still transparently makes it clear that most of the time it's a euphemism for ADHD and autism, but also invites other groups to identify with it. I definitely wouldn't actually use the above definition.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @shel's post:

For what it's worth, your definition above reads as very professional and reasonable to me, but I suppose it depends on who your audience is. It seems like it would read well as a footnote for the first time "Neurodivergent" is used somewhere else in some documentation.

I find that when I'm struggling what to or not to include in things, I usually need to better define or narrow (or prioritize) the audience that I'm targeting.

my understanding about neurodivergent is that its less about having "divergent brain development" so much as a "brain that has diverged", aka its not dependent on childhood/fetal development. this inherently includes traumatic brain injuries, but not necessarily mental illnesses (which a tbi happens to be, like, not that).

i do feel that its wrong to claim that the autistic and ADHD communities insist the word is inclusive, though. they most certainly do not, not in my experience! including schizophrenia and personality disorders (which can be caused by TBIs or often by literally being born with a brain thst had altered development), and other disorders is hella fucking controversial, let alone typical psychological trauma-induced mental health disorders or illnesses. including TBIs is, of course, also controversial afaik, even if that might at least be caused by a disagreement in definition, unlike the others. the neurodivergent community is heavily gatekept in online spaces as a purely autism/ADHD exclusive term

i think it may be important to identify whether or not the context of the controversy is relevant to the project. to potentially prevent future issues by educating people and informing them of topics and discussions that may cause infighting and interfere with organizing, it probably would - but if its supposed to just be a simple definition of terminology, i would go with "neurodivergent refers to divergent brains and the community of people with divergent brains" (or maybe not that, at the very least not implying that the physical divergence of the brain is something that can only happen during fetal development) and leave it at that