shel

The Transsexual Chofetz Chaim

Mutant, librarian, poet, union rabble rouser, dog, Ashkenazi Jewish. Neuroweird, bodyweird, mostly sleepy.


I write about transformative justice, community, love, Judaism, Neurodivergence, mental health, Disability, geography, rivers, labor, and libraries; through poetry, opinionated essays, and short fiction.


I review Schoolhouse Rock! songs at @PropagandaRock


Website (RSS + Newsletter)
shelraphen.com/

nicky
@nicky

ok so like... i get worried about leaving twitter or it falling apart because it's been my main source of ~Online Engagement~ for plugging my art and my cool things i do and my various crowdfund efforts. for years now that's been the case. but then i read some stuff about internal twitter reporting:

Twitter is struggling to keep its most active users - who are vital to the business - engaged... These "heavy tweeters" account for less than 10% of monthly overall users but generate 90% of all tweets and half of global revenue. Heavy tweeters have been in "absolute decline" since the pandemic began, a Twitter researcher wrote in an internal document titled 'Where did the Tweeters Go?'

A 'heavy tweeter' is defined as someone who logs in to Twitter six or seven days a week and tweets about three to four times a week, the document said.

really? that's the criteria for a heavy tweeter?? that's nothing compared to the importance of this shit i've got built up in my head. i hate being on twitter but i used to tell myself it was worth it for like, the exposure or whatever. what exposure?? barely anyone's using it lol. i used to enjoy it, met some great people there, but now i don't. seems like i'm not alone

it's always been a bit of a cesspool but it didn't used to be this bad. and now people are finally getting sick of it. but now i don't have to worry about it since it seems like twitter wasn't that huge of a deal anyway.

i'm realizing now that word of mouth has always gotten me further than any tweet i ever made. luckily that works on all platforms


numberonebug
@numberonebug

I think about this so much. There is this pervasive idea of like, "oh my twitter following is my health insurance" and just! those are tenuous bonds!! and the tools needed to get/uphold those bonds are designed to interfere with the process of building connections that will actually keep someone safe and alive. since I stopped using twitter and live blogging my life I have found myself actually talking to my friends what a wild concept!

The thing that made me snap was realizing how often I'd tell a loved one something really exciting only for them to go "oh yeah I saw on twitter!" and the conversation ending there, and realizing how crushing and empty that felt.

Twitter makes socializing easy and empty. Sitting in a room with dozens of people talking to nobody is not the way to build connections and bonds, it's a way to feel alone despite not being alone. And once an easy route appears you loose the muscles needed for doing the difficult messy work to actually get where you need to go


cathoderaydude
@cathoderaydude

"social media allows you to tell a story to everyone you know exactly once instead of retelling it to every person individually" was never a feature, it was always a bug


shel
@shel

literally because lyn isn't on twitter when we hang out "catching up" is an actual enjoyable social activity and not something that last five seconds. it's actually a really good time.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @nicky's post:

Yeah, my understanding is that Twitter is actually pretty tiny in the grand scheme of things. Like I’ll dump something there if I’ve finished making a game or whatever but I’m not engaging with it more than that. I think I get a lot more engagement with places like discord and just people I know at this point.

feels like we finally had a good excuse to follow through on this thing we've felt for a long time. I think for me that pandemic has also had me feeling like shit is just going faster and faster, and more, and I gotta take the time for more important things than pushing buttons in the skinner box app

I put a lot of work into Twitter since the early 2010s, let it really fuck with me psychologically, etc. I checked my Bandcamp sources for where people are coming from, and the amount visiting direct from Twitter was like 50k all-time compared to 832k coming thru direct links/searches etc (basically the word of mouth number). Completely overshadowed. It's not important, we're just addicted.

I think what makes all of this more confusing is the fact that despite its small relative userbase compared to the other big social networks, Twitter has had this "influence" about it for a while. It was already influential in some circles but I guess it got even more influential/visible in the collective opinion when Trump used it to say everything and nothing, suddenly anything he would tweet was made into "news" and it snowballed from there.

in reply to @numberonebug's post:

Tell me about it. I used to think setting up two accounts was worth doing because I NEEDED TO NETWORK AND POWER THROUGH, DAMMIT but now that Twitter's shown itself to be kind of useless and the engagement sucks my accounts are just sitting there.

Another thing I think is how insular and dumb some of the userbase is, which is just, in Twitterese, "emotional labor" for me.

I've had way too many breakdowns from seeing Greg Whatchamacallit whining about what social issue he's forcing us to look at.

in reply to @cathoderaydude's post:

This this this

I haven't seen or read that much analysis but the one example of this that always got me was comparing artists who were using twitter vs artists who were using telegram announce channels for opening commissions.

Because the number of twitter followers that people needed to reliably nab commissioners was absurdly high. Like people with 1500 followers who can't get their comms filled looking at people with 15K followers and lamenting how they're just small fish.

Meanwhile, over on telegram, people with like, 25 people in their announce channel are having no problem finding someone interested in paying them. Because the level of engagement is an order of magnitude higher.

I have a Twitter post I need to extricate that talked about how artist / fan communities need Announcements, Archive, and Chat from a website, and how deleterious it was to smush them all together on Twitter and make it impossible to parse each of them out in the noise when they are fundamentally different needs.

similar to sites like furaffinity which have utterly failed, in 20 years, to provide for the use case "I Do Not Have Any Interest In Stream Or Comms Opening Announcements," so if you follow any artist you're going to see at least ten of these a week, and it undoubtedly results in people clicking follow less often to keep noise down, or alert fatigue keeping people from checking their notifs at all. nobody wants this! the users don't want it, the artists don't want it, and it's trivial to fix.

all any site needed was a system that let you only subscribe to categories of posts from a person, right up front when you click Follow. it's a single god damn database column and nobody will deliver it.

It's aggravating that so many systems are so close to this but just not quite there.

G+ and Twitter both failed this with circles by making you have to figure out who wants what content

Tags on a wordpress site or tumblr are probably the closest thing I have seen to a proper implementation of this but it doesn't scale to the TL or multiple TLs.

No site really reproduces the columnar views of Tweetdeck etc.

I get where your at but I don't know how to square that with me knowing a lot more about far away friends that I would otherwise ... not really chat with. I guess my main takeaway is that "one network to rule them all" isn't the right model, but at least treating each network as a certain flavor of group chat... might. At least for me