shel

The Transsexual Chofetz Chaim

Mutant, librarian, poet, union rabble rouser, dog, Ashkenazi Jewish. Neuroweird, bodyweird, mostly sleepy.


I write about transformative justice, community, love, Judaism, Neurodivergence, mental health, Disability, geography, rivers, labor, and libraries; through poetry, opinionated essays, and short fiction.


I review Schoolhouse Rock! songs at @PropagandaRock


Website (RSS + Newsletter)
shelraphen.com/

Osmose
@Osmose

a couple = as many as you want it to mean
a few = as many as you want it to mean
several = as many as you want it to mean
many = as many as you want it to mean
lots = as many as you want it to mean
a dozen = as many as you want it to mean1
a score = as many as you want it to mean
multitudes = as many as you want it to mean
a vast amount = as many as you want it to mean
countless = as many as you want it to mean


  1. But consider adding "or so" at the end just in case


vogon
@vogon

one of my favorite things to be jokingly prescriptive about is that "myriad" means "a whole lot", but "a myriad" means "exactly 10,000"

similarly, I like to insist that japanese 八百万やおよろず means exactly 8,000,000


shel
@shel

Forty is the largest number. After forty it's not worth counting. That's basically infinity


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @Osmose's post:

in reply to @vogon's post:

in reply to @shel's post:

On the other hand, Russia began Christianization over a thousand years ago and some of the prominence of forty made its way into the bible (mostly "forty days and forty nights"). So there's a potential for some influence.

???? The Torah was written 6000 years ago and has nothing to do with Christianity. Russians did not insert the number 40 in the story of Noach that's there in the original Hebrew.

I read the original question as asking about any connection, regardless of direction or number of links. I was positing that the Torah influenced Russian (via the Old Testament). I agree the other direction is flatly impossible, and even the possibility of a common factor influencing both seems incredulously remote.