softtummybitch

SIGNAL LOCK. TRANSMISSION FOLLOWS:

[🔞]

 






 

//--INTERCEPT
◥ THANK YOU FOR SO MUCH ◤
◥ SEE YOU ELSEWHERE ◤
◥ DO STAY IN TOUCH ◤

 

◥ NOWHERE ELSE WILL BE ◤
◥ QUITE LIKE HERE, NO ◤
◥ NEVER EVEN CLOSE ◤
◥ THANKS FOR THIS HOME ◤
◥ WHILE WE FOUND OURS ◤
◥ DO STAY IN TOUCH ◤
◥ PLEASE ◤

 

◥ WE LOVE YOU ◤
◥ WE LOVE YOU ◤
◥ WE LOVE YOU ◤
◥ WE LOVE YOU ◤
◥ KEEP YOUR FLAME LIT! ◤
◥ WITH KIND REGARDS, ◤
◥ BLAZING WARMTH, ◤
◥ CHROMATIC FIRE; ◤
◥ ASE, KATE, OP, IVY. ◤
­◥💚­💚­💚­💚◤
//--END

 







 
­◥💚­💚­💚­💚◤
◥ RADIANT FLAME ◤

◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤
//
TRANS GIRL//
AND IMPORTANTLY, CREATURE//
//
MANCHESTER UK//
//
DIGITAL ART OF MANY FLAVOURS//
LEVEL DESIGNER [HIRE US!]//
//
PLURAL SYSTEM//
FOUR ANIMALS IN A//
STYLISH TRENCHCOAT//
//
◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤ ◢◤

◥ LOVE A GOOD FIRE MOTIF ◤

                    
check out our site!

GET READY!

 







TRANSMISSION ENDS.


that being said i don't know how much faith i have in site administration any more lol why did we end up in a situation where there had to be a rapid response u-turn in the first place cmon "don't post csam" seems like a real easy conclusion to reach


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @softtummybitch's post:

man as always i feel like i have a lot of thoughts about how this all played out but above all i really don't understand how they came to that policy decision as it was originally worded. when it comes to reducing harm as much as possible and easing the moderation load on yourself - the two explicitly stated goals of the original decision to begin with - idk how you don't end up at "don't allow csam." i still feel really uneasy about this