solsword

CS instructor and games researcher.

I'm a CS instructor at Wellesley College (Massachusett, Nipmuck, & Wampanoag lands) who does (technical) games research focused on PCG and operationalizable theories of player experience.


ireneista
@ireneista

The official post-Cohost permanent URL for this piece is https://irenes.space/leaves/2024-09-29-vulnerability

when we think about cybersecurity, and how it gets used to justify endlessly spiraling expenditures on building an ever-more-powerful police state...

we think about how one of the most important moments in our life was when we realized it's important to be vulnerable.

yes, we're conflating psychology with technology. but like... the rhetoric feeds on the psychology.

this false idea that we can ever be perfectly safe, it drives us all, as a society, to do more and more extreme things to bring it about.

we have to start from the assumption that we are vulnerable, sometimes. emotionally or technologically. and then we need to figure out what types of things we are willing to be hurt by, what pain we can accept.

it's only by starting from that end that we can properly prioritize the things we should defend against. if we don't convince ourselves that there are things it's okay to be hurt by - a best friend; a lover; a threat actor with more money than we can ever hope to have -

if we don't convince ourselves that there are situations where being hurt is acceptable, then everything that has a chance to make us safe seems like the top priority, and it's impossible to choose which ones to actually do.

and the end result of that is a heart entirely walled off from the world, or a police state in which even the people in charge are constantly terrified.

this thought brought to you by it's 3 in the morning and our sleep meds haven't kicked in yet. thank you for reading.

[this was a thread on Twitter back in May 2021; we've rescued it here because, more than a year later, we're still really pleased with it and keep linking people to it]


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @ireneista's post:

is one of the benefits of being many having collaborative storyboarding and proofreading? because every time this account posts I am blown away by how eloquently you all express complex thoughts. this is just spectacularly said.

really appreciate this thread, from both psych and tech perspectives. (at least personally, i've had an easier time opening up to people with time, but i don't think we've ever sat down and decided/accepted what we're okay with, and it sounds like a really helpful exercise!)

We had a similar thread of argument, we called it "operational risk management:" to do things, there is risk, so you outline what that risk is, and see how much you're willing to accept.

This formulation is delightfully less clinical 👍