i think headcanons r good and cool but also u need to not call that death of the author bc they r not the same thing and not recognizing the difference and combining them in your head makes u much worse at thinking and talking about literature
What You Get When the Stars Collide
- she/they (in a plural sense)
- stardust-reverie.nekoweb.org/index.html
21yo plural autism, trans girl, professional internet weirdo, late blooming theater kid, video editor, occasional musicker, voice actress in progress, still learning about stuff
emily subsystem will probably be main posters
🐐 - goatmily / emily delta
🍁 - catmily / emily tau
🪐 - omicron(?)
💜 - josie/piece (@pieceofjosie)
🦋 - alex
🔆 - soleil
🪄 - marisa (@marisakirisame)
🖥️ - EMI (@exe-cute-able)
and many more...
discord
@stardust.reverie
github
github.com/revsys413/twitch
www.twitch.tv/revsys413buttondown
buttondown.com/stardustreverieitch.io
stardust-reverie.itch.io/You must log in to comment.
in reply to @stardustreverie's post:
AGREED... death of the author isn't "I didn't like how this ended so I'm making my own ending", it's "this ending was about something else but this is the themes we got from it, even if that wasn't their intention at all" (at least, to our understanding)
yeah exactly! i don’t have a super good grasp of it myself, i think (i read the essay but didn’t really understand it), but from what i understand, death of the author means analyzing the text for what’s in it and what it communicates, rather than strictly adhering to what the author was trying to convey and ignoring, yknow, what the text actually says. n that’s the important part—that it has to do with what’s actually in the text. so my thought is headcanons are just making stuff up which is fine but u (general u) need to realize that’s what it is and not get lost in the sauce and mistake that for the text killing the author