stardustreverie

What You Get When the Stars Collide

21yo plural autism, trans girl, professional internet weirdo, late blooming theater kid, video editor, occasional musicker, voice actress in progress, still learning about stuff
emily subsystem will probably be main posters

🐐 - goatmily / emily delta
šŸ - catmily / emily tau
🪐 - omicron(?)

šŸ’œ - josie/piece (@pieceofjosie)
šŸ¦‹ - alex
šŸ”† - soleil
šŸŖ„ - marisa (@marisakirisame)
šŸ–„ļø - EMI (@exe-cute-able)
and many more...


discord
@stardust.reverie

stardustreverie
@stardustreverie

something that seems to have happened in the AAA games industry, from my limited armchair op-ed viewpoint, is that the industry doesn’t seem to have ever grown out of masturbating over ever-increasing realism and high-fidelity graphics for the sake of it, even though we probably hit the threshold at which the average player would actually care about realism long ago, and the industry is actively dragging itself down over it. we need to expend absurd hardware resources just to show we Can and that we’re Capable in the current industry and that we aren’t graphically—technologically—behind the competition. fuck development costs, fuck the user’s storage space, fuck our developers, fuck sustainability


rockergirl
@rockergirl

i remember seeing a post about how back in the day the games industry used to like touting graphics because the jump up from an atari 2600 to an nes, or the nes to the snes, were significant, so it was an easy win to say "buy our game, it looks so much better" with better resolutions, colours, etc

fast forward to today where texture resolutions are reaching ridiculous levels and the graphics cards required to run everything and hard drives to store everything are well beyond the reach of most people, but the industry hasn't stopped trying to go for that easy win, couple with the fact capitalism is reaching it's end point where workers don't get paid enough money to buy anything, profits stop increasing, and companies are fervently trying to keep that line going up by any means necessary, and you have executives pushing for higher graphical fidelity hoping it will equate to increased sales

not helped by the hoards of capital g Gamers who get into arguments about graphics, and winge about games not looking "better" than games from the past (even if it's just one fucking year ago)


stardustreverie
@stardustreverie

this is exactly what i was getting at—it’s an ever-increasing arms race that’s still managing to sustain itself well beyond anything that should’ve ever been reasonable. but it is sustaining itself, because the industry has successfully duped Gamers into drinking their kool aid


uhuh100
@uhuh100

it's not truly sustaining itself - a war cannot last forever. there must be resources used on every side. ideologies are not immune to entropy


stardustreverie
@stardustreverie

on the other hand, what do you do when the resources run dry?
you change tactics. keep things going well beyond their logical conclusion, no matter the cost


uhuh100
@uhuh100

then eventually you will be fighting over a wasteland. then eventually you will become the wasteland. eventually not even the wasteland will be left.

and those who did not fight, who took care of their peoples, their homes, will be affected. but they will survive. they will survive. they will survive.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @stardustreverie's post:

i mean a good part of it is that the console manufacturers need to sell new consoles and that means selling games that are Only Playable on the newest console, rather than it being "Masturbatory" its that they get straight up incentives from the console companies in order for keeping the social contract going

Way back in 2015 I sat in a talk by art director(?) of The Witcher 3 and one thing he said in that talk was that their goal was for the visuals to look "like a 9/10 game".

It always struck me as a weird phrase, but in a way having wasteful, photorealistic graphics is also a bit about showing how opulent your game is in terms of the resources it was able to spend, while still functioning.
Kind of like putting gold leaf on a piece of food. It doesn't really do anything, it doesn't add anything, but it suggests luxury and wastefulness.