sundry

misc dried goods

꩜ Maker of silly things

Other Cohost pages:

Sonic Heroes Extended Universeintroducing...The “the Ring” Podcastan sí 18+

Other project links:

Snolf Robo Blast 2OilliphéistJourney of the Monkey KingGame of Life

My website
oakreef.ie/
Fediverse/Mastodon
cathode.church/@soilseacht

Funny the rules you never notice until someone breaks them. I am reading something where it keeps having dialogue like this:

“Hello,” I said.

“What do you want?”

“I just want to talk.” She glared at me.

“I don’t want to hear it.” I sighed.

It’s putting the reactions from one character in the same paragraph as the dialogue from another and it keeps confusing me. That’s not the normal way to do this right? Normally you would usually keep any descriptions of a character or their actions to their paragraphs of dialogue? I am not just making that up? I feel that that’s true. That it helps keep track of who is speaking in lengthy dialogue sections. But I’m not sure if that’s something I’ve actually seen in style guides or it’s just something I am making up myself now because I am having trouble with his one story.

There might be thematic reasons to intentionally do it with the story in question, to blur the lines about who is who in some conversations, but it does this consistently even in conversations where that is definitely not the case.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @sundry's post:

I think I overall agree with you. You can break these rules but there's a delicacy and an art to it.

I sighed should definitely be on a new line.

For she glared at me, I can see why you might want to keep it with someone else's dialogue but it needs to be more clearly flagged. So:

"I just want to talk," I said. She glared at me, but I persisted. "Really. It's important."