theartofkombat

I like stuff and draw things

  • they/he

COMMISSIONS CLOSED (for now)

Honestly just excited to be here. I'm a Hispanic, bi, non-binary, self-taught artist, burlesque dancer, and witch. I can't really list any favorite things because ND object impermanence. But I do enjoy talking to people and taking commissions when I have the energy, so drop me a line!



Let's assume that magic works such that the results of your spellcasting are equivalent to the amount of effort put into it. (I mostly disagree with this notion, but that's for another time.) Now imagine that you're a technomancer, and you do magic by writing a batch file/shell script then running it. Presumably, based on the above assumption, the more thorough or extensive your code, the better results you get when you run it. If you were to run it again, would you still get the same results? Or would they be diminished because the effort put into the second casting was far less than the original writing of it? I.e., is the original effort persistent across future iterations or not? And in either case, does that same principle extend to other kinds of sorcery? If so, how does that manifest? (Pun very much intended)

In a way, the described bit of programming could be considered a sigil. Does the effort required by our initial assumption come from the creation of the sigil, the charging of it, or both? If the first case is true, how does one quantify the effort? If the second, does the charging need to be done by the caster? People use all sorts of "inanimate" or allogenic methods for charging, like celestial bodies, the elements, even electrical outlets or electronic devices. Do these fulfill the effort requirement? And if it's a combination of both creation and charging, how do the previous questions factor in? Do the two components have to be equivalent, or can one be leveraged to make up for a deficit in the other? Like if you're disabled and can't exert yourself that much--mentally, physically, or otherwise.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @theartofkombat's post:

I have my own half-formed thoughts about how it might work, but I have little experience with sigils. I have done persistent spells with paper and pen myself, but I specifically had those charge with time. In a way those were superficially similar to programming (which might be enough, as far as magic is concerned).

However, wouldn't the best way to find out be to just test it yourself?

Well, as far as I can tell from my own practice...

Magic seems to work based on 3 things: belief, intent, and energy. Now energy could come from raw effort (whether physical or mental) put into the spell, but like you said in your post, energy can come from passive sources as well.

I suppose if you're worried about it being inconsistent, perhaps you could make the program recite a little incantation when it runs? Something to keep it charged, I guess. idk >.<

My perspective is that if you are using a batch file like a sigil, your input energy is electricity, tjus why it works consistently as long as correspondent qualities remain constant.

With sigil magic its part effort but its also meaning, a sigil is a letter, word or phrase of the caster's devising, they inscribe its meaning into the matter of the universe, your effort and sttength of intent put into crafting a sigil determines how deep the meaning scars reality, how profound the effect, how much motility it has. At least this is the theory ive been working off of my entire life.

In terms of energy sources, it depends on the intend, celestial bodies that offer correspondence to your sigil could work, sun or moonlight specifically, or if you crave war one might use mars, some decide to tie it yo their own essence, while a more dilligent witch may tie it to a habitual action meant to constantly keep the sigil alive and powered, like a blood mage may make an altar for that sigil and feed it their blood a few drops a day to keep it empowered.

i am on the far end away from tehcnomancy, off in the weeds, but i usually find one of those two things is required on my part: creation or charging effort. A lot of things come with creation or charging built in--like using a stone one finds as pre-created and then requiring charging or dedication for a purpose, or making something and then sticking it under the moon.

sometimes i like to make gifts for people of things that i have made (effort), or found (low effort), and are then charged (effort) or.... pre-charged i guess, by nature or my phone charger (low effort.) This may come with instructions for how often it should be touched up, or i might show up some while later to check on it. but on the end user's part, there is little effort.

i have definitely combined found (low effort) and charged by someone/something else (low effort). i find that charging a stang in the sunlight has a more general, less pointed effect than doing a more effortful ritual with more moving parts. I have found that creating (higher effort) and charging by my own ritual work (higher effort) can lead to more specific, targeted effects.