Due to a controversial disscussion of this feature we're pausing it
*looks at discussion*
*all of the responses are overwhelmingly negative*
when a github issue has 1229 ๐ and 4 ๐ ........ that's controversy babey
what now???
- (th)ey
- entangled.one/
"i have done a couple bad things"
number of years i have lived on this earth
over 30
You must log in to comment.
in reply to @thricedotted's post:
THE ORIGINAL DEV JUST RE-ENABLED IT WITH A "DISCLAIMER" this is infuriating oh my god
Please verify information independently as LLM responses may not be 100% accurate.
WHAT DID THEY THINK WE WERE USING MDN FOR
previously, this!! now, i guess I'm using... an archive of MDN???? reading the specs directly???? nicely emailing tab questions?????
New github issue: Do you guys think we're fucking stupid
wish there was a third browser engine or some foundation that wasn't entirely fucking lost to all this nonsense
fwiw i don't think they've re-enabled it... they just added a disclaimer to the "AI Help" feature which they never disabled in the first place. "AI Explain" is still commented out and not appearing on the site.
This said one thing that might frustrate me is
- They post "AI Help" and "AI Explain"
- "AI Explain" draws all the fire
- They take down "AI Explain"
- They leave up AI Help because hey, no one was complaining (because we were busy complaining about AI Explain)
did a little dive into the github issue and it turns out "we" is not even the core maintainers or steering committee, just... some guy or two! https://github.com/mdn/yari/issues/9208#issuecomment-1615411943
god where the fuck do I point Sass documentation to now when I need to link to CSS concepts
not to give your employer ideas but they certainly could take this as an opportunity to flesh out web.dev beyond tutorials and into a reference resource. hah.
lmao yeah because Google would never add ill-advised LLM bullshit to its offerings
Link for those who want to gawk: https://github.com/mdn/yari/issues/9208
hey thanks -- i meant to include that in the OP but got distracted by how absurd this all is ๐คก i'll go edit with the link to the issue!
also noticed it's 4 ๐, not 5 like i had stated... lmao lmao lmao