ticky

im in ur web site

  • she/her

web dracat

made:
internet-ti.me, @Watch, Wayback Classic, etc.

avatars appearing:

in 2D by nox lucent
in 3D by Zcythe

"If it were me, I'd have [changed] her design to make [her species] more visually clear" - some internet rando

I post embeds of other peoples' things at @ticky-reposts



spookybiscuits
@spookybiscuits

begging yall to stop using the word "fandom" when you mean "culture" lol. "fandom" to me is consumptive, "culture" is creative. like, furry is a culture, disney adults is a fandom, fanfic is a little of both.


twilight-sparkle
@twilight-sparkle
This page's posts are visible only to users who are logged in.

ticky
@ticky

IMO a culture can be a fandom but a fandom doesn’t necessarily imply a culture


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @spookybiscuits's post:

we agree for sure that there needs to be a distinction here

we're not sure we want to retreat from the word "fandom"

the creative thing came first and capitalism has been successfully enclosing it, by bits and pieces over the decades

we're not sure what the best way to call attention to that is

I get where you're coming from with this, but the thing that always stands out to me with "furry fandom" is that "fandom" meant something really different a few decades ago when furry was new. The sci-fi and fantasy fandoms that furry grew out of had a creative culture more like the modern furry scene at the time - early furry fanzines with comics, art, etc. look a lot like sci-fi and fantasy fanzines of the late 70s. Specific media fandoms like, eg, Star Trek definitely existed, but it feels like "fandom" as a whole meant something way more expansive and creative.

Not that I think other people have to like it, but tbh I kind of like how "fandom" in "furry fandom" is reaching back to something that felt a little healthier and more interesting and keeps it alive a little.