ticky

im in ur web site

  • she/her

web dracat

made:
internet-ti.me, @Watch, Wayback Classic, etc.

avatars appearing:

in 2D by nox lucent
in 3D by Zcythe

"If it were me, I'd have [changed] her design to make [her species] more visually clear" - some internet rando

I post embeds of other peoples' things at @ticky-reposts



very strange seeing tech commentators I usually find to have their heads screwed on wind up quite so boosterish on machine learning in the advent of large language models, when the utility of them has really yet to be established

weirder still to hear them say, for example, "Apple need to catch up" in a field where the bleeding edge is… stuff that is plainly broken and wrong, and when Apple have already been using machine learning in reasonable, responsible ways that are actually broadly useful for several years now

these large language models really do have the gift of the gab


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @ticky's post:

this is honestly baffling to me. Like... already these tech giants invariably copy each other on what 'works' (hint: these things do not work) and now the audience itself is asking for these broad product claims to be applied by every company, no matter what they actually sell.

It's fucking bizarre.

It's almost impossible to do so. All they needed to do was put the average person in front of ChatGPT and for it to barely work to convince the regular person. Even incredibly smart engineers at my company are getting wooed by the thing and I am so very lost.

They've captured our need to anthropomorphize things and it shows. I've seen a couple attempts to rebrand it to sound more ridiculous like SALAMI, but it's not going to work out as long as capital has its hands on the throat of advertising.

They've even cut off any momentum the AI ethics people had by publishing that stupid safety letter with multiple fake signatures.