• they/them

noted silly goose and amv enjoyer. 26.
art account @interplanetjanet
icon art by @maxds


twitter
haderleaf

nex3
@nex3
Anonymous Guest asked:

In reference to your recent post about people not really understanding the differences in what tags, content warnings, and 18+/adult content labels should/could be best used for:

Would you expand on your ideas about how to deploy each of these three, in relation to both text posts and 18+ images?

P. S. As someone very new to A) Cohost and B) the social internet in general, I admit that I have a very poor understanding of what constitutes "good" or "polite" behavior on this website in this specific regard, and reading Cohost's posted rules and regs about 18+ content DID NOT help me to understand these nuances.

I have no authority there, but I think reasonable conventions are pretty much common sense that falls out from the fact that you can flag posts as 18+ and the way tag muffles work. To summarize:

  • Flag a post as 18+ if (and only if) it meets the criteria from the community guidelines: if it's pornography or nudity, either photographic or drawn; or other material which depicts or describes sexual acts in explicit detail.
  • Add content warnings for things that are likely to be undesirable for many or most people to see and aren't already covered by the 18+ requirements above. This covers things like graphic depictions of violence or media spoilers.
  • Add tags for things that are undesirable for some people to see, like common phobias, particular fetishes, or common triggers like food and alcohol. This allows people who care about those things to muffle the tags—upgrading them to content warnings for themselves—without requiring extra clickthroughs for everyone else.

There's nothing intrinsically different between text posts and image posts here, except that text posts can mention body parts without actually depicting nudity, in which case they don't require an 18+ flag.


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @nex3's post:

I’ve seen so many posts flagged 18+ when they are not only SFW but downright family friendly, that it’s almost devalued the 18+ flag entirely for me, and I’m taken aback when it actually is something NSFW.

I’m not going to tell anyone they're using a website wrong, it’s just something I’ve found surprising.

I suspect at least some of these are because people mark their account as 18+ (which flags posts by default) and forget to uncheck it when they post something SFW

but also yeah a lot of completely innocuous stuff that just has the word "breast" in it gets flagged

Both of those, for sure, plus a few instances of “I understand that this is your particular fetish but you could absolutely put that image in a kids cartoon and nobody would object”

I fit this exact scenario and I'm really not sure where I should draw the line between "it's funny so I can tag it appropriately and don't have to mark it 18+" and "it's horny so I must mark it 18+" so I usually err on the side of marking it :'3

Ok this I agree with. I thought you were advocating using the 18+ option as a catch-all and only tagging for certain fetishes, phobias, and triggers rather than using them broadly to give context in this way. I've seen the take of "nsfw means nsfw what do you expect?" so I wasn't sure if that's what you meant. Also I have seen a fair amount of untagged porn I wasn't expecting lately so I guess that's just where my head is at lol.