twi

script kitty



↓ cohost let me center align this challenge ↓
This user is it. (What is it? It's it)
This user is a host for the fungus.
↑ cohost let me center align these challenge ↑



i'm the body selling robot and i'm always selling bodies

breaking into mausoleums doing something naughty



  • also a cat obvs
  • does art, video, coding, gamedev as executive dysfunction allows
    • (godot, zig, some c/c++/c#. if you need a programmer hmu on twitter or something)
  • 日本語はあまりできませんけど、学ぼうとしています
  • very autistic, probably inattentive adhd
  • θΔ maybe, nonhuman for sure
  • 29 & kink/sex positive, period
  • dni if you: have a dni in bio,
    click here to sexually harass this user

(pfp: actual nitw concept art)


IsHeOughtTo
@IsHeOughtTo

lots of people got into the fandom by searching for "digimon porn" (pokemon porn, porn of cartoon characters they liked, etc)

now, these people are earnestly arguing that all of the "digimon porn" and artists who make it should be removed from "normal, safe" sites and forced to the margins where they've shoved feral porn, abdl, ageplay, cub porn, and where actual literal CSA imagery exists.

once it is removed from FA, where will a kid who searches for digimon porn THEN find themselves? we ought to ask because we KNOW they are GOING to search for it, right? you understand that you will not STOP them from searching for it by moving it off of FA. consider exactly how you think you are making people better off


IsHeOughtTo
@IsHeOughtTo

no im saying whether or not they're "allowed to" is immaterial to whether it happens. it is astounding to me that it's forbidden to say this in a community of people that largely FOUND THEMSELVES by searching up horny material that they "should not" have been looking at.

That IS what is happening. you know that. there's an extremely high chance that you did it yourself. and if not you definitely had a friend that did. why are you pretending something else is true? what do you get from pretending that YOU were a special and precocious child but everyone else is a perfect helpless and brainless cherub until they become 18, unless acted upon by some outside perverted force?

all this does is mystify the actual problem (creating situations where a child comes into social contact with an adult who has malicious motives) by pretending that something that happens all the time, is definitely happening now, and continues to happen no matter what you do, is NOT happening and would only ever happen if a Pervert in a Trenchcoat did something monstrous to the grinning empty-headed babydolls you have replaced real children with.

You are doing abstinence-only sex ed but one layer removed - for the thing that kids are FORCED to do because republicans and social conservatives won't let actual sex-ed exist. Between them, and you, the only way children will be able to find information about their own sexuality (and they WILL find it) is to go to the worst places on the internet, look at the worst images posted there, and talk to the worst people they can find.

Is that Good?


IsHeOughtTo
@IsHeOughtTo

if you want to protect kids from abusive adults you have to consider what exactly are the circumstances that are actually bringing kids into contact with those adults

is it the existence of art of someone's diapered bulbasaur OC? i'm venturing probably not. is it the ability to interact socially and sexually on a website that contains pornography without any sort of check or validation on who is interacting and how other than "please promise you're a grownup uwu"? seems much more likely to me. with the knowledge that some number of kids are finding the fandom and its platforms through DELIBERATELY SEARCHING FOR PORNOGRAPHY we come to the conclusion that having a combined social platform / porn hosting site is the most irresponsible thing that could be done.

But no, we're just moving the sexual images of cutesy 4-heads-tall characters into a cesspit. Images which cannot interact on their own. Into a place with people who DEFINITELY CAN.

IDK maybe I'm just a freak


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @IsHeOughtTo's post:

I keep trying to leave a comment here, to add my piece, but I’ve deleted it four times now because I don’t think it really adds anything that you didn’t already cover so well. I’m just angry at the whole thing. It’s so arrogant to think that next generation’s teens won’t just go find what they’re looking for if it gets pushed somewhere else. It wouldn’t have stopped us. Nothing is being achieved here but empty hand wringing.

the thing that upsets me the most is that, that can't be true

something -must- be being accomplished besides empty hand wringing, there -must- be some reason for people to desire this, and it's gutwrenching to conclude that it really is just disgust, and coming up with a seemingly righteous justification for punishing the disgusting, even if the result is harmful to nearly everybody

what's accomplished is the feeling of satisfaction when you stomp a cockroach

It feels like it should be ridiculous to me for that to be the motivation, considering how much of FA’s staff have galleries full of things hit by this rule change- things they are being caught deleting, maybe, but they still existed right. They didn’t show up on accident.

But then again I’m also well beyond the point of thinking that the FA team would ever treat their user base fairly or honestly, so I shouldn’t be so surprised. Awful.

the general atmosphere of disgust for someone that -might- fantasize about such a character being childish, the figure of the roving monstrous pedophile rapist, is i think more than enough for people to take the hit, either on its own, or out of fear of being seen to stand up for the monster

throughout history people have often inconvenienced themselves or even harmed themselves in the service of their own disgust... right wing terrorists shut off power to an entire county to stop one drag show.

possibly im being unfair but when the idea of "protecting" anyone falls apart under the barest analysis, i'm not sure what else there is underneath but disgust for the monsters they imagine to be behind it.

i dont think the userbase will ultimately suffer all that much either - once the initial shock subsides, complying with this will be a lesser evil by far. libido is strong, but only rarely stronger than disgust and there's no monster more disgusting than the one conjured here. there's a reason every moral panic calls on the same monster.

in reply to @IsHeOughtTo's post:

This is extremely well said and I just wanted to put out that you eloquently described a problem that we've been suffering for ages in adult spaces: we increasingly do not have a place we can go, we're told to exist in the same spaces as minors, and then told that it's our fault that we have no ability to hide the things we create for adults from minors when they get exposed to it. It's more I'm not touching you' styles of enforcement bullshit.