So they brought up a example of something they described before of 'art that looks like it wasn't meant to be porn' Or "horseman hitting an anvil while his massive dick is out."
I'm not trying to shame anyone here but here's the thing, right: I'm familiar with the whole casual nudity thing. Or casual hyper if you wanna take it further.
The examples we talk about aren't like that though. There's not that seduction, there's not anything neccesarily drawing on sexually charging the image unless you are incredibly hyper fixated. More times than not it's like, an action shot with a massive dick drawn on a separate layer and added later.
For obvious reasons I won't post the images here, I don't want to start anything and I'm sure everyone is totally normal and reasonable.