the main exception mentioned to the period accuracy is that they're using modern standards of industrial health and safety, which is hilarious
- he/him
- gameboat.org/
member of @staff, lapsed linguist and drummer, electronics hobbyist
zip's bf
no supervisor but ludd means the threads any good
mastodon
mastodon.social/@vogontwitter (inactive)
twitter.com/vogonbluesky
if bluesky has a million haters I am one of them, if bluesky has one hater that's me, if bluesky has no haters then I am no more on the earth (more details: https://cohost.org/vogon/post/1845751-bonus-pure-speculati)
irl
seattle, WA
You must log in to comment.
in reply to @vogon's post:
their line about how the one thing they're not trying to study is 'how many people died building castles' or whatever is a good canned response
putting on my hard hat and punching in to my job of walking in a giant hamster wheel
but also, i love the shots of the regular workers who are really good at it. like dang, what a creation
I really like his recent works of embracing “here’s cool thing and you can too”
13th century OSHA inspector going "Sire, thou cannot go in there, thou must weare a hard hatte!"
the thing is
based on the stories i am told by my spouse
there is always At Least One Safety-Minded Doomsayer on the construction site
(it was them)
(they were. always. right.)
it may not have been a hard hatte, but There Was Always Somebody.
