vogon

the evil "Website Boy"

member of @staff, lapsed linguist and drummer, electronics hobbyist

zip's bf

no supervisor but ludd means the threads any good


twitter (inactive)
twitter.com/vogon
bluesky
if bluesky has a million haters I am one of them, if bluesky has one hater that's me, if bluesky has no haters then I am no more on the earth (more details: https://cohost.org/vogon/post/1845751-bonus-pure-speculati)
irl
seattle, WA

the recent statement from Boston Dynamics et al. that they're never going to work on weaponized robots, alongside the growing market for quadrupedal military robots that look barely removed from their designs, makes me suspect that either

a) there's some quiet technology-exchange program that allows them to keep their hands officially clean while still profiting from the weaponization of robots;
b) they know that they no longer have a technological lead in this subfield of robotics so instead they're rebranding as The Ethical Robot Company, the same way Lyft saw Uber's PR struggles and reacted by branding themselves as The Ethical Scab Cab

pretty depressing either way


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @vogon's post:

The Amazon way of doing this is to hire 3rd party affiliates that hire contractors who are not employees of Amazon. Then when the affiliates do something that Amazon "didn't tell them to do", and the media goes after Amazon for it, Amazon claims that "they don't condone that, but ultimately it's not them but the 3rd party affiliate who did the bad stuff" and then presumably change to a different 3rd party

yeah I don't know too much about the innards of the robot business but I suspect it's something like boston dynamics licenses a "platform" out to a "solutions provider" which gets to brand it with their own name, strap a gun to it, and sell it to people, and that way technically no Boston Dynamics Spot-branded products are military robots

BD is kinda like Bell Labs, in that sure, it exists to sell products to rich people and businesses, but mostly that's just to fund the research, and everyone else uses the research. I'm sure there's licensing, but a lot of it just seems to be intentional cross pollenation