vogon

the evil "Website Boy"

member of @staff, lapsed linguist and drummer, electronics hobbyist

zip's bf

no supervisor but ludd means the threads any good


twitter (inactive)
twitter.com/vogon
bluesky
if bluesky has a million haters I am one of them, if bluesky has one hater that's me, if bluesky has no haters then I am no more on the earth (more details: https://cohost.org/vogon/post/1845751-bonus-pure-speculati)
irl
seattle, WA

vogon
@vogon
This post has content warnings for: the american military's cartoonish level of racism.

vogon
@vogon

which, weirdly, seems to advocate the exact opposite conclusion about whether its goals on AI ethics are political or not?

There is, however, sufficient information to draw the following preliminary conclusions. [...]
PLA discussions of military AI ethics are not political
When discussing military AI ethics, none of the sources discussed Party considerations. Perhaps this is because Party participation is implicit in military ethics discussions, but the absence of political rhetoric is conspicuous by its absence.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdata.2022.991392/full

this country is getting up to truly bizarre levels of saber-rattling


You must log in to comment.

in reply to @maxkriegervg's post:

in reply to @vogon's post:

ohh don't even get me started on the "judeo-christian" bullshit, it's entirely just christian fundamentalism slapping "judeo-" in front of itself to try and paint a thin veneer of unity against the rest of the world's religions without actually drawing from jewish thought at all

that and "judeo-christian values" is invariably invoked to justify explicit endorsement of christianity in ostensibly secular liberal institutions, despite secular liberalism being largely developed in opposition to religious involvement in state. for example, this line of argument was used by conservatives when the Australian Greens proposed that maybe we don't need to open every sitting of Parliament with the Lord's Prayer.

in reply to @vogon's post: