www.coolstation.space

(carls jr ad voice) if it features underage, it doesnt belong on a page

Thank you for summing this up better than I ever could

plenty of people can explicitly state that they want a site where, if cub and ageplay are not allowed due to community discomfort with them, it is at least not the dominant mindset that these things are even an approximate moral equivalent to causing a real human person real suffering by abusing them, that the people who have such internal fantasies are moral slime, liars, degenerates.

in this way,
it IS about chibi art, because if the content of two images can be meaningfully changed by the addition of a crayon in the foreground to code the small character, then the former image can be trivially turned into the equivalent of CSAM even without the artist's consent

it IS about feral art, because as tiresome as it is to state over and over again, the equating of real suffering from a real living being to the IDEA of that suffering is the common thread linking the topics, as well as the topics of other kinks.

it IS about pokemon, because pokemon porn is effortlessly, accidentally accessible by children who are searching for pokemon by name, because pokemon fan communities consist of mostly children, and because these interactions are ignored and glossed over

it IS about kinks, in that the perception of oneself or one's consenting adult partner as nonetheless inexperienced, naive, or unequipped to refuse is the foundation of many kinks beyond ageplay

it IS about sex education, in that the argument that sexualized images will be psychically harmful to adolescents is symbiotic with the refusal of general non-repressive sex education - were the second thing in existence, perhaps children would not be digging into online pornography for answers

it IS about trauma processing, in that publicly venting trauma is one of the few semi-respectable ways out of this discourse, in that being repeatedly called a pedophile and child abuser resurfaces that trauma, in that flooding the website with discussions of csam triggers trauma, in that everybody even tangentially adjacent to this discourse becomes terrified to speak

it IS about lack of moderation, in that harm is caused by people and interactions, and if harm is caused by the people who want to engage with cub porn, harm is also caused by the people who assert that anyone who finds themselves attracted to a sonic or naruto character, or anyone who fantasizes about having had real autonomy and control of their own body as a child, must be a pathological pedophile, sexually sick at their core.

saying "its simple" when it isn't is the recourse of the conservative.

thank u for post this, my friend. cou;ldn't have said it any better if it took me a decade 2 write it.

So to be clear it's about the inability of the character depicted in the image to consent.

Completely unlike the UNTAGGED AND UN-CW'ED noncon porn you reblog out onto the timeline. For...unspecified reasons I guess.

It's the gleeful rejection of any of your own specified principles when it comes to your own behavior that gets to me. Pure ad hoc fig leaf argumentation because all your rhetoric is bad faith.

seeing that this post has 35 comments, opening it up, and only being able to see 7 comments gave me the same physical reaction as a cold wind blowing past me. godspeed OP