on my way to cohost to post about centering the XZ maintainer in proposed responses, I saw this piece which expands a bit on the email trail that documents the difficulties the original maintainer was having, which led them to embrace the malicious maintainer's help.

EDIT:
It appears that some or all of the antagonistic emails were from sock puppets of the malicious maintainer-to-be.

to me this topic of software safety demands a systems approach in the same way that abolitionists look at more traditional notions of safety.


You must log in to comment.