an over deployment of this phrase i think. when i was taught death of the author in college the discussion emphasized that an audience has just as much license as a creator to interpret a body of work. that was the separation. the ethics of consuming, endorsing, or materially supporting that work wasn't really even brought up.
want to say there are many works of art im more fond of because the artist is a neurotic reprobate of some sort, or some kind of self-defeating reactionary oroborus, or otherwise unwell or hateful or simply lost to consensus reality in some respect.
